Friday, November 20, 2009

Fatah: 3rd intifada will not use armed struggle

'Fatah officials warn of third Palestinian intifada'
By Jack Khoury, Haaretz Correspondent
20/11/2009

Fatah had made a strategic decision to declare a third intifada against Israel, movement officials told Nazereth-based newspaper Hadith Anas, citing the failed peace talks as the reason for their resolution.

The newspaper report quoted Fatah Central Committee members as saying that the movement wished to implement a decision made during its sixth convention, which assembled last August in the West Bank city of Bethlehem.

One of the movement's top officials interviewed by Hadith Anas said the third intifada will have a widespread popular base, adding, however, that unlike the previous popular struggle against Israel, which was sparked in September 2000, the movement will not endorse an armed struggle or the use of firearms.


"We want thousands of Palestinians to demonstrate daily near the settlements of the occupation, carrying out a human siege, and calling for the end of the occupation," one senior official said.

According to the report, Fatah chief and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas agreed to the resolution in principle, stipulating only that the struggle mustn't become a violent one.

Sources estimate that Abbas could prepare the conditions which would allow for such a move by stepping down as PA President as well as by declaring the dissolution of the PA by the end of the year.

Fatah officials had commented recently on the need to duplicate the weekly anti-separation fence rallies in the villages of Na'alin and Bil'in in locations across the West Bank, as well as turning some of those demonstrations against nearby settlements.

A senior member of an Arab-Israeli Knesset party, who maintains close ties with top Fatah and PA officials, said that anti-separation fence rallies could spark renewed popular resistance, if they continued to escalate as they did week ago near the Kalandia checkpoint.

The official said that PA sources have come to understand that unarmed popular resistance, centering on symbols of the West Bank occupation, could garner sympathy for the Palestinian cause in international circles as well as embarrassing the Israeli government.

"The first intifada gained significant diplomatic ground as far as the Palestinians are concerned since its symbol, a boy throwing rocks at a tank, made it impossible for Israel to claim it was defending itself against terror as it did in the second intifada, followings the city-center bombings," the official said.


--------------------
Today's news from the Palestinian non-violent struggle:

ISM -- Bil’in: Undercovers arrest Palestinian youth at his workplace
ISM -- Inciting non-violence: support Bil’in’s struggle
ISM -- Burin celebrates successful olive harvest, despite numerous settler attacks

Video from this week's demonstration in Bil'in village:

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Israeli policy of demolishing civilian homes continues

Ref: 119/2009

Date: 19 November 2009

Time: 10:00 GMT


Extensive Israeli Campaign Against Palestinian Civil Construction Activities in Area C; New Demolition Orders Issued Against 60 Palestinian Houses, Apartments and other Civilian Facilities in the West Bank


Israeli Occupation Forces have escalated their systematic campaign against Palestinian civilian construction activities in areas under their full control according to the Oslo Accords signed by the government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in 1993. Areas classified as Areas C in the West Bank are currently subjected to extensive Israeli campaigns aimed at undermining the Palestinian presence. Israel is also expanding construction activities in settlements and the annexation of new areas of Palestinian lands in Area C, including occupied East Jerusalem and its surroundings. The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) strongly condemns all these measures taken by Israel and stresses the legal status of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). PCHR calls upon the international community to urgently and promptly take serious action to compel the government of Israel, the occupying power, to put an end to all illegal measures. The international community’s inaction with respect to the impunity granted to Israel encourages Israel to commit further violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law.


According to investigations conducted by PCHR, the Organization and Construction Department of the Israeli Civil Administration issued 35 orders to demolish or stop construction works in houses and other civilian facilities in Areas C. In addition, the Israeli Municipality of Jerusalem issued an order to demolish an apartment building of 25 flats in occupied East Jerusalem. Approximately 275 individuals, including 180 children, live in these houses and apartments. According to Palestinian sources, since the beginning of 2009, Israel has issued approximately 2,300 demolition orders.


Recently, Israel issued orders to demolish or stop construction works in Palestinian houses or civilian establishment as follows:

  • On 8 November 2009, the Israeli Municipality of Jerusalem issued a decision to bulldoze an apartment building belonging to Sharhabil ‘Alqam in Tal al-Foul quarter in Beit Hanina village, north of Jerusalem. ‘Alqam began construction works in his apartment building in 2002 on an area of 500 m2. The 7-storey building is composed of 25 residential apartments and was sold to Palestinian families comprising more than 150 members.
  • On 12 October 2009, Israeli forces delivered notices to stop construction works in 12 houses and in a bird farm in al-Salahat area in Roujib village, east of Nablus. Five of the threatened houses are resided by 33 individuals, including 22 children.
  • Also on 12 November 2009, Israeli forces delivered notices to 11 Palestinian civilians to demolish or stop construction works in houses and establishments in Um al-Kheir area to southeast of Yatta village, south of Hebron. The notices threaten 17 establishments, including residential houses where 57 individuals, including 39 children, live. The majority of the owners of the threatened establishments are members of the Bedouin al-Hathalin tribe. The owners of these establishments stated that notices were delivered to demolish or stop construction works in establishments that are between 50 and 300 meters to the north of the fence of “Karme’el” settlement.
  • On 18 November 2009, Israeli forces delivered notices to demolish five houses in ‘Azzoun village, east of Qalqilia. The houses, home to 35 individuals, including 20 children, are located in the east of ‘Azzoun village where the Israeli settlement of “Ma’ale Shamron” is being established.
  • Israeli forces also delivered a notice to al-Bireh Municipality to stop construction works in al-Bira Municipality’s International Stadium under the pretext of the lack of a building license. Sources from al-Bira Municipality stated that the Israeli Civil Administration in “Beit Eil” settlement delivered a notice to the contractor to stop construction works in the Stadium under the pretext of lacking a building license saying the project is in Area C.
In light of the above, PCHR reiterates that:

First: according to International Humanitarian Law and numerous UN Resolutions, the Palestinian West Bank, including east
Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip are classified as occupied territory.


Second: the natural growth of the Palestinian families requires that these families implement construction activities in order to meet their growing living needs. Because of the complications of getting building licenses, Palestinians are forced to carry out construction works above their houses to meet their residential needs.


Third: Settlement activities in OPT are illegal and constitute a war crime. Israeli forces apply an apartheid system regarding construction works in Palestinian villages on one hand and in Israeli settlements on the other.


PCHR strongly condemns Israel’s recent measures and all settlement activities and plans in the occupied West Bank, including occupied East Jerusalem, and calls upon:


  1. The High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention to fulfill their legal and moral obligations under Article 1 of the Convention to ensure Israel's respect for the Convention in the OPT. PCHR believes that the conspiracy of silence practiced by the international community has encouraged Israel to act as if it is above the law and to continue to violate international human rights and humanitarian law, including continued measures to create a Jewish majority in occupied East Jerusalem.
  2. The international community to take urgent and prompt action in order to compel the government of Israel to put an end to all settlement activities in the OPT, especially in occupied East Jerusalem, and to dismantle Israeli settlements, which constitute a war crime under International Humanitarian Law.
  3. The European Union/ EU member States to activate Article 2 of the Euro-Israel Association Agreement, which provides that Israel must respect human rights as a precondition for economic cooperation between the EU States and Israel. PCHR further calls upon the EU States to prohibit importation of goods produced in illegal Israeli settlements in the OPT.

Sunday, November 15, 2009

From Gaza to Obama: An open letter

Link: http://maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=239943Barack and Michelle Obama dine with Edward and Mariam Said at a 1998 Arab community event in Chicago


Dear Mr President,

You will probably not read this letter due to your busy schedule and the huge number of messages you receive from presidents, kings, princes, sheiks, and prime ministers. Who is a Palestinian academic from Gaza, after all, to have the guts and write an open letter to the President of the United States of America?

What has triggered this letter is a picture of your Excellency sitting with the late Palestinian intellectual Edward Said. That, of course, happened before 2004, i.e. before you underwent a process of metamorphosis which I personally think is unprecedented in history. Seeing you with Edward Said, I must say, surprised me. Said, a true public intellectual must have said something to you about the suffering of the Palestinian people. In the picture, you and your wife seem to be listening attentively, and admiringly, to him. But the point remains; did you really understand his eloquent, passionate defence of the rights of the indigenous inhabitants of Palestine? Judging from your recent policy shifts, I very much doubt it. It is precisely the incongruity between the photograph and these policy shifts that has prompted this letter.

Mr President,

The whole world celebrated your election as the first African-American president of the US. I did not. Neither did the inhabitants of the concentration camp where I live. Your sympathetic visit to Sderot—an Israeli town which was the Palestinian village of Hooj until 1948 when its people were ethnically cleansed-- three years after your first visit to a Kibbutz in northern Israel in support of its residents, and after your pledge to be committed to the security of the State of Israel and its "right" to retain unified Jerusalem as the capital city of the Jewish people—to give but few examples—were all clear indications of where your heart lies.

Another reason for the writing of this letter is shock at the indifference and arrogance with which Secretary of State Hilary Clinton dismissed Palestinian concerns about Israel's illegal Jewish-only settlements in the West Bank. Only a few weeks ago you made the admirable statement that all Jewish settlement must halt, and you made it clear that this included expansion of existing settlements as well as the construction of new settlements. However, when Netanyahu let it be known that he had no intention of stopping settlements, you missed an historic opportunity to draw a line: no more billions and no more weapons for Israel unless and until this condition is met. Now Secretary of State Clinton has the Herculean task of pretending that your position on Jewish settlements has not changed, though it is clear you have chosen not to use the very real power at your disposal to bring Israeli policy into line.

About six months after your election, you gave a speech in Cairo, addressed to the Arab and Islamic worlds; which some people found impressive. I found it impressive in form, but not in substance because your actions have not matched your rhetoric. Why did I not buy the new language of the new American administration? Because while you were giving your speech, we were burying my neighbour, a terminally ill patient, who needed treatment in a hospital abroad, since, thanks to the siege imposed by your own administration and Israel on the Gaza Strip, the facilities that would have saved his life are not available in Gaza. Like more than 400 terminally ill people in Gaza, my neighbour lost his life. In spite of the fine Arabic words of peace, “salaam aleikum,” you made it crystal clear that the point of reference in any negotiations in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is Israel's security. By doing that, Mr. President, you are effectively marginalizing the whole issue of Palestine, and unfortunately setting the stage for renewed Israeli assaults against a starving Gaza, an entity that has, thanks to your "unbreakable” ties with Israel, been transformed into the largest concentration camp on Earth.

Your failure to support the Goldstone report, your indifference, not to say your contribution, to Palestinian suffering and the process of “politicide” against the Palestinian people of Gaza is, to say the least, unfathomable, coming from a man who listened so earnestly to Edward Said. Your advisors must have told you about the cutting off of medicine, food and fuel to the concentration camp where I live. Patients in need of dialysis and other urgent medical treatment are dying every single day. A majority of our children, many the same age as your two beautiful daughters, are badly undernourished.

You must have skimmed through the executive summary of the Goldstone report detailing the horror inflicted on 1.5 million civilians for 22 days, horror caused by F16s, Apache helicopters, and phosphorus bombs made in American factories. Hundreds of children were burnt to death by phosphorus bombs; pregnant women were brutally targeted in what Israeli soldiers boasted off on their T-Shirts: "1 bullet, 2 kills." And yet, not a single word of sympathy, Mr. President! Edward Said had this to say upon his first visit to Gaza: "It’s the most terrifying place I’ve ever been in… it’s a horrifyingly sad place because of the desperation and misery of the way people live. I was unprepared for camps that are much worse than anything I saw in South Africa." This was back in 1993, Mr. President, before conditions dramatically deteriorated. Gaza has now become, as the leading Israeli human rights organization B'tselem describes it, “the largest prison on Earth.”

Mr Obama,

Unlike your predecessor, you seem to be a smart man. You must have realized that a two-state solution has been rendered impossible by Israeli colonization of the West Bank, by the war on Gaza, by the construction of the apartheid wall, by the expansion of so-called Greater Jerusalem, and by the increase in the number of Jewish settlers in the West Bank. You must have realized also that there are six million refugees, most of whom live in miserable conditions waiting for courageous, visionary leaders committed to true democracy, human rights and international law to implement UN resolution 194. And yet, you and your State of Secretary, like every U.S. president since 1967, have decided to support Israel in creating conditions that made the two-state solution impossible, impractical and unjust.

Were you a supporter of the Bantustan system in South Africa under the Apartheid system? Are you opposed to equal rights and the transformation of Israel/Palestine into a state for all its citizens? The two-state solution means the Bantustanization of Palestine, a solution you, to our knowledge, never supported for South Africa. Are you, Mr. President, opposed to civic democracy, which is the demand of most Palestinian civil society and grassroots organizations? This is what your role models, Martin Luther King and Steve Biko, died for. Was Nelson Mandela wrong to spend 27 years of his life in pursuit of justice by demanding equality for the indigenous people of South Africa? Do you realize that what you are supporting in the Middle East is a racist solution par excellence? A solution based on ethnic nationalism. Your secretary of state and envoy to the Middle East, unashamedly, stood with beaming smiles next to Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who, not only defends openly the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, but also calls for a new genocide in Gaza. Do you realize, Mr. President, that this Hitlerite fascist might become Israel's next prime minister, thanks to your administration's complacency and support?

Our only immediate demand is that your administration insures that Israel fulfills its obligations in terms of international law. Is that too much to ask?

Mr President Barak Hussein Obama,

We, the Palestinian people, are fed up!

Sincerely,

Professor Haidar Eid
Gaza, Palestine


Haidar Eid is an independent political commentator and Professor in the Department of English Literature at Al-Aqsa University in Gaza.

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Another protest breaches the apartheid wall

In Bil'in, on the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall...



-----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
Maan: "Palestinians breach wall near Tulkarem"
14/11/2009

Bethlehem - Ma'an - At least six demonstrators were arrested in the northern West Bank after they breached a section of Israel's wall on Saturday, Palestinian and Israeli sources said.

The protesters said they intended to march to lands that were left isolated behind the wall in Deir Al-Ghusun, northeast of Tulkarem, and managed to break open one of the barrier's gates before Israeli soldiers invaded the village.

One demonstrator was lightly injured after being struck with a rubber-coated bullet in the leg, onlookers said.

"Today's demonstration was the opening salvo for a public campaign by the Deir Al-Ghusun municipality and the affected farmers," said Anarchists Against the Wall, an Israeli group, in a statement. "As the demonstration was coming to an end, a large group of soldiers surprised a group of the protesters by closing in on them from the direction of the village, and arrested 18 of the village's youth."

A spokeswoman for Israel's army said soldiers and military police units responded to a riot, using non-lethal means, northeast of Tulkarem, and that six were detained for damaging the barrier.

Jonathan Pollak, one of the group's founders, told Ma'an that 18 demonstrators were originally detained, but added he was looking into the possibility that some were later released.

The wall in the area of the village cuts deep into West Bank land, leaving about 2,500 dunams (620 acres) of the village's land on its west side, affecting 120 land owners, including dozens who have never received permits to tend to their farmland. Elsewhere, the barrier snakes through the interior of the West Bank, looping around Israeli settlements and fragmenting Palestinian communities.

Marking the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, Palestinian demonstrators breached the wall near Ramallah on Monday. Last Friday, protesters in the village of Ni'lin also managed to tear down a section.

In an advisory opinion issued in July 2004, the International Court of Justice in the Hague declared the path of Israel's wall in the West Bank illegal in its entirety, and ordered its removal.

------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
Maan: "Medic among two hurt by live fire in Nil'in"
14/11/2009

Bethlehem - Ma'an - Israeli forces used live fire on Palestinian demonstrators protesting Israel's separation barrier in the West Bank village of Nil'in on Friday, activists said and the military confirmed.

Rumors had been circulating that the Israelis would respond more harshly than usual due to the activists' success in pulling down a section of the wall at the Qalandiya military checkpoint a week earlier.

"These rumors were confirmed," said Ibraheem Amera, coordinator of the Nil'in popular committee. "A huge army of Israeli soldiers was awaiting [protesters] and immediately started [to] fire huge amounts of tear gas, rubber coated steel bullets and also live ammunition."

Amera said the popular committee had warned protesters to be extra cautious on Friday, because he believed a "decision was made by the Israeli military, because in Nil'in the wall has been taken down twice already by the people, and after the fall of the wall in Qalandiya, the Israeli military is afraid that the 'Nil'in falling wall virus' will start to spread throughout the whole West Bank."

Two Palestinians, including a medic, were reportedly injured, according to a statement from the committee, after Israeli forces made an incursion through fields from three different sides, closing in on a group of around 100 demonstrators. "The army was shooting live ammunition from a distance of less than three meters... and two people sustained minor injuries from grazing shots."

A witness said one soldier ran up to a Palestinian Red Crescent Society media, "grabbed him by the neck and pushed him to the ground, then the soldier started beating him. The volunteer sustained no serious injuries, except for some bruises."

An Israeli military spokeswoman confirmed that soldiers fired .22 calibre rounds, but insisted that they were used within the army's rules of engagement, and only when protesters turned violent. She pointed out that a soldier was lightly injured by rocks that she said were thrown by protesters.

Protests continue throughout West Bank

In the nearby village of Bil'in, residents gathered at a large demonstration called by the popular committee in honor of the death of Yasser Arafat. They were joined by international and Israeli activists, as well as a group of members and supporters of the Democratic Front for Peace and Equality (Hadash) and a delegation of members of the Palestinian People's Party.

The protest was led by Israeli Knesset Member Mohammed Baraka, the front's general secretary. One international activist was injured and dozens suffered tear-gas inhalation when Israeli forces opened fire. Protesters expressed solidarity with Baraka, who will stand on trial in next week as a result of his participation in one of the demonstrations in 2005.

Demonstrators wore t-shirts with a slogan commemorating the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, "From Berlin to Bil'in, The Wall Shall Fall." They also chanted slogans against the Israeli wall.

An international activist from the United States was also injured, the popular committee said.

In Al-Mas'ara, a village near Bethlehem, residents gathered raised Palestinian flags and banners demanding that farmers be allowed to access their lands to pick olives. As they have every Friday for the past three years, protesters were intercepted by Israeli soldiers who had set up a barbed-wire fence at the entrance to the village, effectively cutting off the villagers' access to their lands.

Demonstrators chanted against "the discriminatory policies of the occupation and reminded [them] that only this morning, farmers who were picking olives on their lands in the surrounding villagers were harassed by settlers while Israeli soldiers stood by," the local popular committee said in a statement.

In Arabic and English, protestors asked the soldiers to reconsider their occupations and join the Palestinian, Israeli and international civilians "on this side [of the wall] who abide by the international human rights and who work together for just peace."

Protestors attempted to remove the barb wire and continue their march towards their lands and the site of the wall, including one who managed to get by. "A woman from the village asked the Israeli soldiers what they were doing here in her village and pushed them out of her way, succeeding in continuing her walk towards Um Salamoneh, defiantly carrying the Palestinian flag," the statement said.

Interview with Bilin resident Mohammed Yassen

Interview: Living under constant fear of arrest

Jody McIntyre writing from Bilin, occupied West Bank,
Live from Palestine,

5 November 2009

So far Israel's night raids into Bilin have failed to suppress Palestinian resistance. (Oren Ziv/ActiveStills)

Mohammed Ahmed Issa Yassen, 20, lives in the occupied West Bank village of Bilin, where he works in his family's car garage business as a mechanic. He is also a student at the al-Quds Open University, but since he has joined the Israeli intelligence's "wanted" list from the village, studying has been difficult. The Electronic Intifada contributor Jody McIntyre interviewed Mohammed about living under the constant threat of arrest:

Jody McIntyre: How many times have the Israeli army been to your house?

Mohammed Ahmed Issa Yassen: During the most recent wave of arrests in the village [which has been over the last four months], the army have been to my house eight times. The first time they came was 3 July; I was not at home, so they started trashing our house and destroying the furniture. My mother, who is 52 years old, was at home at the time, and they told her to bring her son to prison. Each time they came, they were more and more aggressive towards my mother. Nowadays, she can't sleep at night.

They also went to the house of my older brother, Mazen, and gave him an invitation demanding that he hand me in at Ofer military complex, so that they could arrest me. They didn't say why they wanted to arrest me.

JM: How have the night raids affected your life?

MY: I can't live a normal life. I can't sleep at home during the night, because I fear that the army will come to arrest me, and during the day I must work; my father passed away in January of this year, so I must earn money for the family. We don't live a luxurious lifestyle, not by any means, but we need to have food on the table.

My young nieces and nephews used to come over to my house to stay with [their] grandmother, but on one occasion the army invaded while they were here, and now they're too afraid to sleep over again. It's not just my family though, it's a problem for the whole village -- no one can sleep at night anymore.

JM: What about your studies and relationships with friends?

MY: It was difficult to continue my studies before the night raids, because of the expense of traveling to university and paying the semester fees, but now it is pretty much impossible. The night raids have ruined my education.

Some of my friends are afraid to hang out with me now, because they fear that they might also be arrested. I don't want to go to stay at my friends' houses anymore, or to have them over to stay, because I don't want to drag them into my problems.

JM: Has anyone else from your family been arrested in the past?

MY: At the beginning of the nonviolent resistance in Bilin, towards the start of 2006, they were using a similar tactic as recently, invading the village at night and arresting the participants of the demonstrations. They arrested my oldest brother Bassem, and kept him in jail for four months.

At around the same time, they arrested my younger brother Abdullah. He was just 14 years old at the time. I was 16, and it was the first time I had seen the soldiers at such a close range ... the first time I'd had a chance to look them in the eyes. I was terrified.

During the second or third of the most recent raids in my house, they arrested Abdullah, now aged 18, again. He's been in jail for the last two months, and won't be released for another four and a half. I miss Abdullah so much ... before he was arrested, we would spend the whole day working together in our family's garage, and then playing around afterwards. I would give him some money from the business' takings, without telling our mother ... sometimes we didn't have enough money to go around, so I would give him some from my own pocket, just to make him feel like he was living a normal childhood. Since our father died, I've felt like a father to Abdullah.

JM: Why do you think the Israeli army want to arrest you?

MY: I don't know why they have made me into this big criminal ... I have to work all day to make sure my family has bread, so I don't even have time to go to the demonstrations! Young boys from the village, under intense interrogation, supposedly "confessed" that I had thrown stones in the past -- this isn't true, but even if I had, what difference does this make to the fourth largest army in the world? After all, they are the ones stealing our land!

It seems that every couple of years, the army in Bilin, perhaps under different leaderships, try a new tactic to stop our nonviolent demonstrations. Sometimes they arrest people from the village, like they are doing now, sometimes they impose curfews, and sometimes they kill people ... like my friend Bassem Abu Rahme.

They think they can stop the demonstrations in Bilin, but they can't, so they punish us instead.

JM: What is your message to the Israeli government who want to put you in jail?

MY: Leave me alone so that I can go back to my studies, to play football with my friends, and to continue with my normal life. And release my brother Abdullah so I can see him again.

If Israelis want to meet me then we can go to the playground and have a game of football, not in a military prison!

JM: Do you think there will ever be a peaceful solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

MY:I just want to see a peaceful solution in my house and in my village. For now, it is difficult for me to think about the bigger picture.

Jody McIntyre is a journalist from the United Kingdom, currently living in the occupied West Bank village of Bilin. Jody has cerebral palsy, and travels in a wheelchair. He writes a blog for Ctrl.Alt.Shift, entitled "Life on Wheels," which can be found at www.ctrlaltshift.co.uk, where a version of this article was originally published. He can be reached at jody.mcintyre AT gmail DOT com.

Friday, November 13, 2009

BBC: " West Bank deportation challenged"

--------------------------------------------

Israel's Supreme Court has said a Palestinian woman whom the Israeli army deported to Gaza from the West Bank should be able to challenge the move.

Bethlehem University student Berlanty Azzam, 21, was deported two weeks ago.

Berlanty Azzam (12 November 2009)

The Israeli military said she had been given a permit in 2005 allowing her to spend only a few days in Jerusalem.

But an Israeli human rights group says that when Ms Azzam left Gaza there was no such thing as a special permit for Palestinians to enter the West Bank.

The organisation, Gisha, believes tens of thousands of other Palestinians in the West Bank are also under threat of deportation for similar reasons.

'Illegal resident'

Ms Azzam was stopped at a checkpoint in the West Bank by Israeli soldiers at the end of October, two months before she was due to complete a degree in business management in Bethlehem.

When they saw that the address listed on her identity card was in Gaza, she was detained for six hours, then blindfolded and handcuffed and told she would be taken to a detention centre in the southern West Bank.

"The driving took longer than it should have and I started to think something was wrong. I started to wonder, what are they doing to me?" Ms Azzam said.

After the car stopped and the blindfold was lifted, she saw she was at the Erez crossing to Gaza. She was then forced to enter the territory without being given the chance to speak to a lawyer.

"The decision that a person's address listed in the Population Registry constitutes an essential condition for the legality of his/her residence at that address - with no explicit legal basis and with no official notification... undermines the fundamental principles of the law," said a lawyer for Gisha, Yadin Elam, in its petition to the Supreme Court.

Gisha warned that if Ms Azzam's deportation were permitted, an estimated 25,000 Palestinians living in the West Bank who had Gazan addresses on their identity cards risked being removed.

The human rights group also noted in its petition that Israel had made no security allegations against Ms Azzam, and that the manner in which she was removed had violated her right to due process.

Regarding the army's claim that Ms Azzam was present in the West Bank "illegally", Gisha argued that at the time she left Gaza, a special permit for Palestinians to remain "simply did not exist".

Furthermore, it said, Israel did not allow people to change their addresses from Gaza to the West Bank, and had not issued a single entry permit for the purpose of travelling to study to Palestinians from Gaza despite an Israeli High Court ruling in 2007 saying they should be allowed.

At Thursday's hearing, the Supreme Court ordered the state to give Ms Azzam the chance to challenge the process of her deportation.

There will be an "administrative hearing", before Israeli military officials, at the Erez crossing next week, for which she will be entitled to legal representation.

"I'm dreaming of the day when I can return to my studies. I am worried and fearful of what might happen, and I hope that my right to education will not be violated," Ms Azzam said.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Kevin Coval: "Why I am not a Zionist"

Why I am not a Zionist
By Kevin Coval, The Electronic Intifada,
5 November 2009

Build equality, not walls. (ActiveStills)

Last week I was disinvited from my second Jewish conference in two months for poems I'd written in solidarity with Palestinians, poems that make an unapologetic call for justice. Subsequently, I and the poet I was to read with at the J Street conference, wrote a response to being censored. People from all over the country wrote to us supporting free speech, supporting art as a tool for change, supporting real talk about the degradation of Palestinians, and people wrote to let us know they disagreed. Some more thoughtfully than others.

We decided to hold our reading anyway in Washington, DC during J Street's inaugural conference at an alternative location. We were hosted by the Busboys and Poets space. The room filled with a spectrum of ideas. We read our poems and during the question and answer period, no one was shouted down. Not the Israeli army refusenik, not the liberal Zionist apologist, not the Palestinian student who asked us to include more about the Palestinian people in our poems, not just the land or idea of nation-state, a point beautifully made and incredibly profound. No one shouted down moderator Laila al-Arian, a brilliant journalist and activist, whose father was a Palestinian political prisoner in America, now freed because of his daughter's persistence. The crowd was cool and civil, though broad in opinion.

Since the second Palestinian intifada I have thought, written and spoken about these issues, but over the course of these last several weeks, I have arrived at a new beginning. Prior to now, I muddled this issue in complexity. But I have come to realize it is actually simple and clear. I am a Jewish-American man in solidarity with the Palestinian people. I am in solidarity with Israeli and American and All people who work and risk their lives and livelihood for justice. I am not restricted to working within the confines of the Jewish-American community. Justice and resistance to imperialism is a global, human concern for all people. For Jews, yes, but not Jews alone. For Palestinians, yes, but not Palestinians alone. It will take us all to push and demand governments and corporate interests to create fair, equitable living conditions. It will take all peoples to hold history accountable for the atrocities that occur.

This is an analogy. America celebrates Columbus day even though Columbus and American settlers killed, enslaved and pushed indigenous peoples off land they lived on. Tragically, indigenous peoples have been nearly wiped out of existence and pushed to the furthest margins of our culture that revels in amnesia. Main St., mainstream American culture does not expect Native Americans to celebrate Columbus, nor care nor know nor imagine if they do or not. Native Americans are not a demographic population Hallmark cares to account for. It is preposterous to think Jews would celebrate Kristallnacht, the night of glass when SS troops stormed and terrorized their German ghettos. In Israel, Independence Day is called Yom Haatzmaut. Communities gather to play music, dance and watch fireworks. The Chief Rabbinate has declared this day a Jewish holiday in which prayers should be said. But Palestinians remember 1948 and the formation of the State of Israel as al-Nakba, the Catastrophe. A day of murder, displacement and forced Diaspora. A day families are torn apart and ripped away from their homes. A state-sanctioned celebration of their dehumanization and second-class citizenship.

For this reason alone, I cannot believe in the integrity of the Zionist project. It's built on bodies and lies. It denies the existence of people and a people. One of its slogans, rooted in the same malicious revisionism as American history and Holocaust denial, is a land without people, for a people without land. Columbus didn't discover shit. He enacted the desires of empire and the fetishization of "discovery." The formation of the State of Israel is rooted in blood and deceit, is the same story as all colonies built in the name of imperialism, capitalism and dehumanization. Therefore, I am not Zionist.

I am not pro-Israel because in January Israel murdered more than 1,400 Palestinians. They bombed schools and hospitals. They bulldozed homes and bodies. Israel builds a separation wall, as Germany did, as the United States does between here and Mexico, as the rich do between themselves and the rest of us. I am not a believer in borders. I have been mistaken for Italian, Puerto Rican, Arab and Muslim, but I am a suburban Jew who sought out hip-hop cultural space across red lines and Chicago segregation. I learned borders are to be contended and crossed. Israel believes in borders. Israel practices apartheid. On one side, irrigated lawns and swimming pools in illegal Israeli settlements. On the other side, Palestinian disenfranchisement, denied access to drinking water, medical assistance, jobs, the ability to earn an income or vote in the country that governs them, that limits their movement with passports, checkpoints and curfews and closes them into open-air prisons. I cannot be in favor of these practices, nor the state that enacts them. These practices are to be resisted, protested and pushed against. Those whose bodies are legislated against, contained, detained and maimed by state-sanctioned terror are to be stood with and listened to.

This week has provided clarity. This is not a complex issue. There is the brutality of governments and the need for the liberation of a people, all people. I am a Jewish person who stands with Palestinian people relegated to second-class citizenship and Israeli soldiers who refuse to enact racist militarism. I am not a nationalist; therefore I am not a Zionist. I am against the oppression of any person and people. I am not a builder of walls. I believe in equity and democratic practice, therefore I am not pro-Israel. I am an advocate for truth, justice and reconciliation. I believe in this. I believe in this now. I believe in the work ahead.

Kevin Coval is the author of Slingshots (A Hip-Hop Poetica) and Everyday People and co-founder of Louder Than A Bomb: The Chicago Youth Poetry Festival. He can be reached at kc AT kevincoval DOT com.

Saturday, November 07, 2009

20 years after falll of Berlin wall, anti-wall resistance in Palestine

From Berlin to Palestine: no matter where, no matter how tall, all walls fall

By, Bil’in Popular Committee

6 November 2009

The 20th anniversary to the fall of the Berlin Wall will be marked this Friday in mass demonstrations across the West Bank calling for an immediate dismantling of Israel’s wall and settlements

Exactly twenty years ago, On 9 November 1989, the Berlin Wall came crumbling down in two days that inspired hope for a world in which walls could no longer keep people apart. Today, a wall twice as high and five times as long is being built by
Israel in the West Bank, in blunt contempt of international law, to separate Palestinians from their lands.

Despite the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion from 2004, which had pronounced Israel’s wall illegal, and called for its removal, no significant changes on the ground were made.




The demonstrators raised a model of the Wall at the Wall itself, which stated that, as the Berlin Wall fell twenty years ago, the Bil’in Wall must fall today.

The anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall has been declared an international day of action against Israel’s barrier. Today the protesters called for its removal, and attempt to implement the ICJ’s decision.

Several demonstrators suffered from tear gas inhalation from canisters thrown at them by the Israeli occupation soldiers in their attempt to suppress the weekly protest of Bil’in citizens and solidarity groups.

The demonstration was called by the Popular Committee Against the Wall and started directly after the Friday prayers. Bil’in citizens were joined by a group of international and Israeli peace activists and together they raised Palestinian flags and banners condemning the occupation, racist policy of building the Wall and settlements, land confiscation, road closures and detention and killing of innocent people.

The Brecht-Eislerchoir of Brussels Belgium sung several songs of solidarity and resistance to support the struggle in Bilin. The choir has presented in Belgium a choral piece ,The Shouting Fence, on the Palestinian situation with text by Mahmoud Darwich. After the concerts we wanted to see with our own eyes what the effects are in the daily life of Palestininans. Our attendance in the demonstration in Bilin strengthens our commitment to the Palestinian struggle for freedom In this way we try to raise awareness in Belgium about the occupation and the apartheid wall. In addition to that we have anther group from Ireland from IPSC .

Two days before, a large group of European diplomats made a visit to Bil’in, and went to the Wall to see how it has stolen the villagers land. They then held a meeting with the Popular Committee where they heard about the affects of the IOF’s night raids into the village. Diplomats visited from Romania, France, Slovenia, Sweden, UK, Portugal, Denmark, Netherlands, Malta, Austria, Finland, Czech Republic, Poland, EU, Ireland and Belgium.
--------------------------
--------------------------

Ni’lin demonstrators topple 8 meter tall concrete wall

6 November 2009

20 years to the fall of the Berlin wall: Demonstrators toppled 8 meters tall concrete wall in Ni’ilin

Three protest marches were held today in the West Bank to mark the 20th anniversary to the fall of the Berlin wall, which has been declared an international day of action against Israel’s barrier. In Ni’lin, the 300 demonstrators managed to topple a part of the eight meters tall concrete wall that cuts through the village’s land. Following the direct action, the army fired scores of live rounds at the demonstrators.

The concrete wall in Ni’lin – five to eight meters (15 to 25 feet) in height – has only recently been laid on the path of the wall cutting through Ni’lin’s lands, in addition to the already existing electronic barrier and razor-wire.



Since the Wall was built to allow more land to annexed to the nearby settlements rather than in a militarily strategic manner, demonstrators have been able to repeatedly dismantle parts of the electronic fence and razor-wire surrounding it. The section of the Wall in Ni’lin is the only place along the route of the barrier where a concrete wall has been erected in an attempt to deal with the civic, unarmed campaign waged by the village in protest of the massive land theft that will enable the expansion of the illegal settlements of Modi’in Il’it and Hashmonaim.

Since Israel began its construction in the year 2002, This is the first time demonstrators succeed in toppling a part of Israel’s barrier which is a concrete wall. One of the demonstrators, Moheeb Khawaja, said during the protest: “Twenty years ago no one had thought the monster that divided Berlin into two could be brought down, but in only two days in November, it did. Today we have proven that this can also be done here and now. It is our land beyond this wall, and we will not give up on it. We will win for a simple reason – justice is on our side.”

Background

Israel began construction of the Wall on Ni’lin’s land in 2004, but stopped after an injunction order issued by the Israeli Supreme Court (ISC). Despite the previous order and a 2004 ruling from the International Court of Justice declaring the Wall illegal, construction of the Wall began again in May 2008. Following the return of Israeli bulldozers to their lands, residents of Ni’lin have launched a grassroots campaign to protest the massive land theft, including demonstrations and direct actions.

The original route of the Wall, which Israel began constructing in 2004, was ruled illegal by the ISC, as was a second, marginally less obtrusive proposed route. The most recent path, now completed, still cuts deep into Ni’lin’s land. The Wall has been built to include plans, not yet approved by the Army’s planning authority, for a cemetery and an industrial zone for the illegal settlement Modi’in Ilit.

Since the Wall was built to annex more land to the nearby settlements rather than in a militarily strategic manner, demonstrators have been able to repeatedly dismantle parts of the electronic fence and razor-wire surrounding it. Consequently, the army has erected a 15-25 feet tall concrete wall, in addition to the electronic fence. The section of the Wall in Ni’lin is the only part of the route where a concrete wall has been erected in response to civilian, unarmed protest.

As a result of the Wall construction, Ni’lin has lost 3,920 dunams, roughly 30% of its remaining lands. Originally, Ni’lin consisted of 15,898 dunams (3928 acres). Post 1948, Ni’lin was left with 14,794 dunams (3656 acres). After the occupation of the West Bank in 1967, the illegal settlements and infrastructure of Modi’in Ilit, Mattityahu and Hashmonaim were built on village lands, and Ni’lin lost another 1,973 dunams. With the completion of the Wall, Ni’lin has a remaining 8911 dunams (2201 acres), 56% of it’s original size.

Ni’lin is effectively split into 2 parts (upper and lower) by Road 446, which was built directly through the village. According to the publicized plan of the Israeli government, a tunnel will be built under road 446 to connect the upper and lower parts of Ni’lin, allowing Israel to turn Road 446 into a segregated-setter only road. Subsequently, access for Palestinian vehicles to this road and to the main entrances of upper and lower Ni’lin will be closed. Additionally, since the tunnel will be the only entryway to Ni’lin, Israel will have control over the movement of Palestinian residents.

Israel commonly uses tear-gas projectiles, rubber coated steel bullets and live ammunition against demonstrators.

Since May, 2008, five of Ni’lin’s residents were killed and one American solidarity activist was critically injured from Israeli fire during grassroots demonstrations in Ni’lin.

* 5 June 2009: Yousef Akil Srour (36) was shot in the chest with 0.22 caliber live ammunition and pronounced dead upon arrival at a Ramallah hospital.

* 13 March 2009: Tristan Anderson (37), an American citizen, was shot in the head with a high velocity tear gas projectile. He is currently at Tel Hashomer hospital near Tel Aviv with uncertain prospects for his recovery.

* 28 December 2008: Mohammed Khawaje (20) was shot in the head with 5.56mm caliber live ammunition. He died in a Ramallah hospital 3 days later on 31 December 2008.

* 28 December 2008: Arafat Rateb Khawaje (22) was shot in the back with 5.56mm caliber live ammunition and pronounced dead upon arrival at a Ramallah hospital.

* 30 July 2008: Yousef Amira (17) was shot in the head with two rubber coated steel bullets. He died in a Ramallah hospital 5 days later on 4 August 2008.

* 29 July 2008: Ahmed Mousa (10) was shot in the forehead with 5.56mm caliber live ammunition and pronounced dead upon arrival at a Ramallah hospital.

In total, 19 people have been killed during demonstrations against the Wall.

Israeli armed forces have shot 40 demonstrators with live ammunition in Ni’lin. Of them, 11 were shot with 5.56mm caliber live ammunition and 24 were shot with 0.22 caliber live ammunition.

Since May 2008, 87 arrests of Ni’lin residents have been made in relation to anti-Wall demonstrations in the village. The protesters seized by the army constitute around 7% of the village’s males aged between 12 and 55. The arrests are part of a broad Israeli intimidation campaign to suppress all demonstrations against the apartheid infrastructure in the West Bank.
--------------------------
--------------------------

al-Ma’sara demonstrates against the Apartheid Wall

By, Al-Ma’sara Popular Committee Against the Wall

November 6, 2009

In today’s demonstration against the illegal construction of the Apartheid Wall that is designed to steal the agricultural lands of the villages of Southern Bethlehem, the people of al-Ma’sara celebrated the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall in Germany. In chants and speeches, the demonstrators insisted on the illegality of the Wall and of Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories, while international and Israeli activists showed support using percussion instruments.

Evoking the removal of the Wall, the children of the village succeeded in removing the barb wire and cross the arbitrary barrier which the Israeli army puts up every Friday to prevent the demonstrators from reaching the actual construction site of the Wall. Several children sustained cuts on their hands while stepping over the barb wire. The soldiers threatened the demonstrators with arrests and violently pushed the children back across the fence.

Meanwhile, one military vehicle entered the village from the back and parked on the main road, thus encircling the demonstrators from both sides. On their way back to the village, the demonstrators stopped at the vehicle and crowded in on the soldiers, singing, clapping, and playing drums. A female protestor from the village asked the soldiers why they insisted on penetrating deep into Palestine, always as aliens to this land.

Friday, November 06, 2009

UN General Assembly Endorses Goldstone Report

Maan: "The UN General Assembly in New York overwhelmingly endorsed South African jurist Richard Goldstone's Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict on Friday.

A resolution supporting the report passed the UN's largest body with 114 votes in favor versus 18 opposed. Forty-four states abstained."

the complete Maan article:
UN General Assembly backs Goldstone report
----------------------------------------------
BBC coverage: UN backs Gaza war crimes report

Tuesday, November 03, 2009

Two interesting Gideon Levy pieces

Settlements are fertile ground for Jewish terror
By Gideon Levy, Haaretz Correspondent
02/11/2009


The parade of the self-righteous got underway Sunday night: Yaakov Teitel was described as a "foreign element," "wild thorn" and "rotten apple." Even if he acted alone, spoke and hallucinated in English, even if he was mentally disturbed, as his attorney claimed, it does not change the fact that Jack the Ripper from the West Bank settlement of Shvut Rachel - contrary to his predecessor in London - acted on ground that was fertile like no other.

Yes, the settlements and especially the illegal outposts where Teitel lived and hid his weapons, along with the Kahanist settlement of Kfar Tapuah where he got his start - these are the places for such dangerous nuts. This is their refuge, where they can hide arms without being bothered and go on hate-filled killing sprees without being seen.

It is no coincidence that a terrorist or killer has never risen from within Peace Now, Gush Shalom or Yesh Gvul. However, with God's help, we have already seen two murderous terrorists from Shvut Rachel. Never has a leftist called for the death of someone who disagrees with him - and we must always remember this when we speak of left and right....


for the complete article visit:
http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1125294.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Swedish reporter in Israel: Not all criticism of you is anti-Semitism
By Gideon Levy, Haaretz Correspondent

Donald Bostrom didn't know he needed this. With Moses, a gigantic bodyguard in a suit and tie watching over his Tel Aviv hotel room with an earpiece and a concealed gun; with a handful of demonstrators who greeted him in the wee hours of the morning at Ben-Gurion International Airport; and with the program for his visit to Israel, in which it is explained that during his trip to attend the Dimona Media Conference, he will be accompanied by two bodyguards, that the details of his visit will be "classified" and that he will wait in a "security room" before and after an interview to be conducted with him today by Yair Lapid.

Donald Bostrom didn't know he needed this. He arrived here Sunday, in an attempt to explain to Israelis what he meant in his scandalous article about alleged organ harvesting by the Israel Defense Forces - a brave step on his part and a no-less-brave step on the part of the organizers of the Dimona conference - who were already attacked by Minister Silvan Shalom, who decided to boycott the gathering and withdraw the money his ministry had pledged to the conference...


for the complete article visit:
http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1125294.html

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Palestinian settlement workers fall through the cracks

Palestinian settlement workers fall through the cracks
By: Kieron Monks

One of the cruelest ironies of the occupation is that Palestinians are building it. Tens of thousands of laborers are employed in construction of the wall, settlements and the industries around them. Their co-operation does not go unpunished. Despite a 2007 Israeli High Court ruling that gave the same rights to Palestinians working in settlements as Israelis, the reality is still low wages, hazardous conditions and no job security.

The Barkan industrial area is the hub of discontent. It stands not a stone’s throw from Ariel, the largest settlement in the West Bank and home to 30,000. Over 100 companies from around the world are based in Barkan, employing over 6,000 people, more than half of whom are Palestinian. The 2007 ruling had the effect of upping wages to an average of 10 shekels (2.67 US dollars) an hour, but employers have found creative methods of swindling their workforce. Increasingly recruitment is arranged via sub-contractors, either Palestinian or Israeli, who provide bulk quantities of desperate laborers for the factories. PGFTU legal adviser Fatih Nasir estimates subcontractors take “40% of a worker’s daily wage.”

No contract is signed and the overall employer applies for temporary permits, usually three months, on behalf of his workers. Such an arrangement makes employment status ambiguous, meaning that when challenged on the conditions of his workforce, an employer can deny responsibility. Many workers believe they are working for the subcontractor. A joint survey from international human rights groups found that less than a quarter of Barkan employees receive official wage slips, while just 34% earn minimum wage. Where slips are provided they often contain inaccurate information that allows an employer to pay less.


Fatah Nasir describes a recent case of a worker being paid for 14 days of a month when he had actually worked 24. The official hours were doctored to match minimum wage requirements.

Often the subcontractor will recruit from his own village, getting the best deals for company bosses at the expense of their neighbours. Sulwa Alenat of the influential human rights group Kavlaoved believes employer and contractor work closely to suppress dissent. “If there is a complaint they will co-operate and threaten the worker. In this way the contractor stays in a powerful position. This will only change if more people start to challenge their conditions.”

Neither do employers take any responsibility for health and safety. Accidents are frequent in such dangerous industries as steelwork and construction, with few precautions to prevent them. Sulwa is very familiar with the problem. “Injuries are very common and the victims never receive compensation. We send inquiries to the National Institute of Israel but receive no reply. No one is ever questioned and there is never compensation provided. Employers will not pay for someone to be treated in an Israeli hospital so ambulances will just drive them to the nearest checkpoint and tell the worker to get a taxi to a Palestinian hospital.”


The case of Yousef Najada exemplifies the injustice. In August 2008 he injured his eye working in Tomer settlement in the Jordan Valley. The accident occurred at 8am, after which Najada was forced to take a taxi alone to the hospital in Jericho. After receiving first aid he was referred to the Muslim clinic in Ramallah, then took another taxi to Ramallah. When he got to the clinic he was evacuated by a Red Crescent ambulance to the St. George Hospital in Jerusalem, arriving at 2pm Only then did he receive medical care, which he paid for himself.

Last year five workers in the Jordan Valley fell when the scaffold they were working on collapsed. They have not been able to work since and have not been compensated. In many cases workers are fired if they are too badly injured to work for a long time. Israeli law stipulates workers must receive 90 days paid recuperation in the case of accidents but Palestinians never see this. An anonymous worker from Barkan suffered a hand injury and was told “to come back the next day or to leave permanently”.

Sulwa believes the lack of dissent in these cases reflects the desperation of people forced into this way of life. “Most people working in the industrial area cannot find jobs in Palestine or Israel. They continue working around settlements for a long period of time and eventually bring their families and children in too. Most of them work in very low positions in factories, never rising higher than a superviser.”

Sadly, there is little choice for the Arab population here. A Palestinian woman who has worked for several years in a Barkan textile factory explained why she is there; ““Our village is blocked by Israeli checkpoints making it almost impossible to sell or manufacture anything by ourselves. My husband doesn’t get a working permit to enter Israel. Our farmland where we had our income has been taken by the Israelis. So what choice do we have? My family needs to eat.”

Israel acknowledges that a large part of the industrial zone is built on private Palestinian land, around 14% by PeaceNow statistics. With this went the source of income for many families based in the region, including 70 hectares of olive trees, bulldozed in the 1980’s. Some families have initiated legal proceedings against the occupying industries, on the basis that settling on private land is illegal, but except in one case (the farmer received 1.5 hectares compensation) these appeals have been fruitless.

The rapid expansion of Barkan has come about through the favourable tax and cheap land available on Palestinian land, as well as the lax laws governing worker’s rights. Floor space costs approximately half what it would inside Israel’s borders, leading to an influx of international investors. Who Profits, an offshoot of the coalition of Women For Peace detail companies from Sweden, the Netherlands, Great Britain and, predictably, the USA, who have a presence in Barkan. Pressure from human rights groups has succeeded in embarrassing the foreign investors exploiting the conditions.

A report published by Swedwatch and Diakonia probed the murky business practices of Assa Abloy, a Swedish company running the Mul-T-lock factory in Barkan. It challenged the company bosses for profiting from an illegally situated factory and bought attention to the degrading conditions of their employees. For a country renowned for a liberal foreign policy, the findings were sufficiently uncomfortable for Assa Abloy to relocate their factory, noting the “inappropriateness” of manufacturing in the West Bank. The realization took them eight years. Following their withdrawal, Barkan Wineries, a subsidiary of Heineken, also shut down their operation. In a statement, company spokesmen acknowledge the motive was purely political.

Putting pressure on Israeli employers has proved far more difficult. Kavlaoved helped 40 employees of Royal Life to bring a legal case against their bosses, in protest over payment below minimum wage. Several were sacked and others claim to have received death threats. “Some workers have been offered a small compensation,” Salwa reveals, “but they do not accept because it is not a fair offer”. Salwa believes trade unions are becoming more effective at mobilizing worker activism; “they are changing and improving, now that they are less distracted by politics. Lawsuits against employers are more common now and workers are beginning to understand their rights better.” Still it remains a struggle to cajole impoverished workers into risking their income, knowing full well that such an action would likely result in their sacking.

The case against Royal Life is ongoing and will likely prove a landmark case whatever the final outcome. If it is in favour of the workers many more cases will follow and conditions should improve for settlement workers all over the country. If the High Court rules against them it will be one of the clearest signs yet that Palestinian workers are deemed unworthy of basic human rights.

Kieron Monks is a freelance reporter from London. He is working as an assistant editor on the Palestine Monitor in Ramallah, as well as news magazines and websites in the UK.

Friday, October 30, 2009

Israelis Targeting Grassroots Activists

Israelis Targeting Grassroots Activists
By Mel Frykberg


EAST JERUSALEM, Oct 27 (IPS) - Israeli authorities are increasingly targeting and intimidating non-violent Palestinian grassroots activists involved in anti-occupation activities who are drawing increased support from the international community.

Several weeks ago masked Israeli soldiers stormed the home of Ehab Jallad from The Jerusalem Popular Committee for the Celebration of Jerusalem as the Capital of Arab Culture for 2009.

"Around 3am the soldiers started kicking and banging on the door and threatened to break it down if I didn't open immediately. My young daughters were terrified as they didn't know what was happening," recalls Jallad, a young Palestinian architect from Jerusalem.

"The soldiers then proceeded to ransack my home before confiscating my laptop, several computers, files with my contacts and my ipod. When I asked them why they were doing this and told them I wanted to call my lawyer, they told me to shut up and threatened to beat me up," Jallad told IPS.

This is just the latest incident in which the Israeli authorities have arrested and taken Jallad in for questioning over his organisation of cultural events marking East Jerusalem as the capital of Arab culture. Jallad has also been monitoring the protests outside Al-Aqsa Mosque during the last few weeks.

"The Israeli officer questioning me said he knew I was in contact with the media but stated this would not help. He further warned me that I was being monitored, and if I continued with my activities my family and I would be subjected to further raids and harassment," said Jallad.

The same morning that Jallad was arrested Israeli security forces raided a warehouse used by Jerusalem community groups and cultural events organisers.

"They vandalised material we use for cultural events and confiscated other material," Jallad told IPS.

To date Jallad has not been charged with anything. But a war between Palestinians and Israeli continues unabated over Israel's continued Judaisation of East Jerusalem.

This has involved the expulsion of Palestinian residents from their homes in the eastern sector of the city and the expropriation thereof to make way for Israeli settlers.

A number of Palestinian families continue to live in tents pitched on streets outside their former homes as they watch Israeli settlers go about their daily business in their former homes.

Periodic violence between the two groups has broken out during the last few weeks with the Israeli police selectively arresting only Palestinians.

The Jerusalem Municipality has deliberately limited building permits for East Jerusalemites despite a chronic housing shortage, while the settlement of Israeli settlers in the area has been actively encouraged. Palestinian homes built without permits are regularly destroyed.

The Palestinian Authority (PA) envisions East Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state. Under international law East Jerusalem is part of the Palestinian occupied West Bank.

The PA has tried to counter Israel's Judaisation efforts by asserting its presence in the contested part of the city. Organising cultural events has been part of the effort.

Hatem Abdul Qader, a PA official for Jerusalem Affairs, has been arrested by Israeli security forces several times over the last few months. He has also been banned from the city for several weeks on a number of occasions.

Meanwhile, Muhammad Othman, 33, from the northern West Bank village Jayyous continues to languish in solitary confinement in a dirty Israel prison cell devoid of natural light or windows.

Othman has been labelled a "security threat" by the Israelis ever since his arrest on Sep. 22 as he crossed into the West Bank from Jordan. Othman had returned from a trip to Norway where he met with senior officials to discuss human rights abuses in the occupied Palestinian territories. The Norwegian government has divested its funds from Elbit, an Israeli company which supplies drones and other military technology.

During his incarceration Othman has been subjected to hours of interrogation, handcuffed, seated in stress positions and denied sleep. Like Jallad he has had no involvement in military activities which could constitute a security threat to the Jewish state. He too, has not been charged with any infringement of the law.

But Othman, a political activist, has been joining the Stop the Wall Campaign against the illegal Zufim settlement built by Russian billionaire Lev Leviev. The Stop the Wall Campaign is fighting against Israel's construction of a separation barrier which separates Israel proper from the West Bank.

The wall cuts through swathes of Palestinian territory dividing Palestinians from their agricultural fields, and trapping some Palestinian communities in pockets of territory between Israel and the West Bank.

The wall was ruled illegal by the International Court at the Hague, and several years ago an Israeli high court ordered the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) to reroute parts of the wall, arguing that is compromised the livelihoods of Palestinian farmers.

Othman is also involved in the Boycott Divestment Sanctions (BDS) campaign which has been drawing increased international support.

Othmans supporters believe his main "crimes" are his activities on behalf of the BDS which wants to see a boycott of Israel along the lines of the former boycott against apartheid South Africa.

"I think Israel is worried about its reputation amongst the international community now that more people are waking up to the human rights abuses and injustices being committed here," Jallad told IPS.

"I think in some ways we are perceived as more of a threat than an armed cell of Hamas fighters precisely because we are non-violent and what we are fighting for is reasonable."

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Amnesty International: "Israel Denying Water To Palestinians"

"Palestinians in the Occupied Palestinian Territories are denied access to the water they need by the Israel authorities. At the same time, Israeli settlements in the West Bank, established in contravention of international law, receive all the water they want -- sometimes 10 times as much per capita as neighbouring Palestinian villages."



"The Israelis have placed constraints on the Palestinian Authority that prevent it from developing efficient water and sanitation systems, and a third of the water that the Palestinian Authority manages and distributes to the population under its jurisdiction is lost in leakages."

"Meanwhile in Gaza, which is isolated by the Israeli blockade, water and sanitation projects are on hold because no materials for construction and maintenance are allowed in. Over 90 per cent of tap water in Gaza is unfit for human consumption because it is contaminated by seawater and sewage."

To view the complete report, "Troubled Waters: Palestinians denied fair access to water" visit:
http://www.amnesty.org.uk/uploads/documents/doc_19771.pdf

To take action through Amnesty International:
http://www.amnesty.org.uk/actions_details.asp?ActionID=644

---
more information:
---

Kate Allen: Swimming the Israeli settlements
http://indyeagleeye.livejournal.com/11786.html

Amnesty International UK blog:
http://blogs.amnesty.org.uk/blogs_entry.asp?eid=4334

BBC: Gaza thirsts as sewage crisis mounts

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8327146.stm


BBC: Report: Palestinians denied water
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8327188.stm

Friday, October 23, 2009

Video: Goldstone Responds to US Criticism

Maan: "Richard Goldstone, the former judge who led the UN-mandated fact-finding mission regarding Israel’s winter war on Gaza, challenged the US to justify its objections to his report on Thursday."

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Report: Targeting Civilian in Operation Cast Lead

Ref: 49/2009

Date: 22 October 2009


PCHR Release English Version of ‘Targeted Civilians: A PCHR Report on the Israeli Military Offensive against the Gaza Strip (27 December 2008 – 18 January 2009)’


Today, the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) releases the English-language version of ‘Targeted Civilians: A PCHR Report on the Israeli Military Offensive against the Gaza Strip (27 December 2008 – 18 January 2009)’.


This report comprehensively documents the Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip, in which more than 1,400 Palestinians were killed, and over 5,300 injured. The overwhelming majority of those killed and injured were civilians. Attention is also paid to the extensive destruction of civilian object, including homes, and the damage inflicted on industry, agriculture, and the infrastructure of the Gaza Strip.


The report is available for download here.

http://www.pchrgaza.org/files/Reports/English/pdf_spec/gaza%20war%20report.pdf

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Reporters Without Borders: "Israel in free fall

From Reports Sans Frontieres (Reporters Without Borders) Annual Report Summary:

--------------------------

Israel: operation media crackdown

"Operation Cast Lead, Israel’s military offensive against the Gaza Strip, had an impact on the press. As regards its internal situation, Israel sank 47 places in the index to 93rd position. This nose-dive means it has lost its place at the head of the Middle Eastern countries, falling behind Kuwait (60th), United Arab Emirates (86th) and Lebanon (61st)."

"Israel has begun to use the same methods internally as it does outside its own territory. Reporters Without Borders registered five arrests of journalists, some of them completely illegal, and three cases of imprisonment. The military censorship applied to all the media is also posing a threat to journalists."

"As regards its extraterritorial actions, Israel was ranked 150th. The toll of the war was very heavy. Around 20 journalists in the Gaza Strip were injured by the Israeli military forces and three were killed while covering the offensive."

Israel cast down by Operation Cast Lead

"This is the first time that Israel (internal) is not at the head of the Middle Eastern countries in the press freedom index. By falling 47 places to 93rd position, it is now behind Kuwait (60th), United Arab Emirates (86th) and Lebanon (61st). Arrests of journalists (and not only foreign ones), their conviction and in some cases their deportation are the reasons for Israel’s nose-dive. Israel’s media are outspoken and investigate sensitive subjects thoroughly, but military censorship is still in force."

"Like the United States, Israel has a separate ranking for activities outside its own territory. Israel (extraterritorial) also fell, to 150th position, as a result of its offensive against the Gaza Strip, Operation Cast Lead, in which the Israeli military bombarded buildings housing Palestinian news media. Foreign and Israeli media were denied access to the Gaza Strip throughout the offensive."

RSF Israel Information page: http://www.rsf.org/en-pays154-Israel.html

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Haaretz: Israel Continues West Bank Settlement Building

16/10/2009

Human rights activists monitoring the West Bank report that despite commitments Israel made to President Barack Obama's administration last month, widespread building activity commenced three weeks ago in at least 12 settlements.

The work consists of ground preparation, pouring concrete and drilling construction foundations.

This work is not part of the projects that Israel and the United States had reached an understanding on. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak had agreed with the administration to complete some 2,500 housing units that were already in various stages of construction at the time.


The dozen sites do not appear on the list of 492 new housing units that the defense ministry issued after Barak approved their construction. Work on these units began after the list was released.

The construction sites are located in the settlements Carmel, Kiryat Arba, Betar Ilit, Elazar, Shilo, Talmon, Nili, Yitzhar, Bracha and Rosh Tzurim.

Customary planning procedures in the West Bank stipulate that no ground preparing work may be carried out without the defense minister's permit. The minister may only allow the work after the construction plan has been issued and after the period for presenting objections has passed, or after the objections have been rejected.

Transportation Minister Yisrael Katz (Likud) gave the go-ahead on Thursday for several transportation projects in the West Bank. Katz met 13 local authority heads in the territories and agreed, among other things, to have the Israel National Roads Company build access roads to several settlements. The minister also approved plans to improve safety in the settlements such as entrances, sidewalks and traffic circles near schools.

Katz told Haaretz that the plans had no political significance.

In addition, West Bank roads are being renovated in the past six weeks.

800 units in 34 settlements

Construction work is also taking place in the settlements Tekoa, Nokdim, Alon Shvut, Alonei Shilo, Bakan, Givat Zeev, Dolev, Har Gilo, Talmon, Yitzhar, Kochav Yaakov, Kfar Adumim, Kfar Etzion, Mevo Horon, Matityahu, Naaleh, Etz Efraim, P'duel, Tzofim, Kedar and Kalia.

The Peace Now movement last week reported that ground preparing work for the construction of 800 housing units was being carried out in 34 settlements.

Gush Etzion council head Shaul Goldstein commented: "Peace Now's sole purpose is provocation and dispute-mongering. They are a foreign agent sent by foreign governments, monitoring completely legal construction of people who love the nation and country. It's time Peace Now disappeared."

Friday, October 16, 2009

UN Human Rights Council Adopts Report Accusing Israel of Gaza War Crimes!

After months of developments, weeks of delays, and numerous intentionally sidetracked endeavors, on Friday, the United Nations Human Rights Council adopted the "Goldstone report" which accuses the Israeli army (as well as Hamas) of war crimes carried out during the December-January Gaza war. Over this 23 day war, more than 1,300 Palestinians were killed as were 13 Israelis (4 of which were killed by IDF 'friendly fire')

The vote to adopt the resolution went as follows:

Countries in favor: 25
Countries against: 6
Countries abstaining: 5

The report rejects the Israeli claim that the Gaza War was a response to homemade rocket fire from the Gaza Strip. It accuses Israel of directly targeting Gazan civilians and civilian infrastructure with missile air strikes, aerial bombings and artillery fire. The report also discusses Israel's use of illegal weapons including white phosphorus munitions and flechette-delivering cluster bombs.


Subsequent sections of the argue that the ongoing economic and military blockade of the Gaza Strip is collective punishment as well as a use of disproportionate force against a civilian population.

The report accuses Hamas, and its military wing the al-Qassam Brigades, of launching homemade and commercially manufactured rockets into Israeli civilian territory, an accusation that Hamas has not denied.

The Goldstone report recommends that the Israeli government pay reparations to Gazan civilians who had homes and business destroyed in the bombings, and that the UN Security Council to launch an investigation which can be adjudicated in the International Criminal Court.

To view the complete report (as .pdf):
"Human Rights in Palestine and Other Occupied Arab Territories: Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict"

-------------------------------------------------------
News Coverage of the UN vote:
-------------------------------------------------------
Haaretz: "UN body okays Goldstone Gaza report accusing Israel of war crimes"

BBC: "UN backs Gaza 'war crimes' report"

Maan: "UN Human Rights Council endorses Goldstone report"

Palestine Center: The Coming Intifada

By Yousef Munayyer
http://www.palestinecenterblog.org/2009/10/brief-coming-intifada.html


Anyone watching the Middle East and the Occupied Palestinian Territories recently can tell you that anger and rage is bubbling just below the surface. What may not seem apparent is that a new intifada, or uprising, may be right around the corner.

When this happens, western media outlets will scramble to explain how and why we have come to this state. They will likely place the blame on the Palestinians, the victims of Israeli oppression, once again ignoring any and all history or context of the illegal Israeli occupation and its daily horrors.

If some might find this farfetched, we have only to look back at the recent war on Gaza when the western media blamed the victims and realized much later that they had ignored the ongoing siege of the Gaza Strip and Israel’s violation of the ceasefire.

It is important, then, to note now the reasons why a critical mass of discontent is building.

Palestinians have endured dispossession and occupation for over 60 years. Despite this, some segments of Palestinian society have been willing to enter into a peace process with the Israelis on the basis of ending the illegal occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, and establishing a Palestinian state.

Of course, these efforts have been in vain. During the post-Oslo peace process period, settlements grew at an astonishing rate, indicating that Israel was interested not in relinquishing the territory that it illegally occupied, but rather cementing its hold and effectively annexing it.

Then there was the (Former U.S. President) George W. Bush era of disengagement and disregard while Israel continued settlement expansion, and built a wall deep inside the West Bank that separated Palestinians from Palestinians.

Israel’s attack on Gaza this past winter was the culmination of failed American attempts to broker peace. With over 1,400 murdered, most of which were civilians, Palestinians were given an additional 1,400 reasons to doubt Israel sought any peaceful agreement. Of course, this war took place without objection from the Bush White House.

Yet, despite all of this, some Palestinians had hoped that a new president would help bring justice to their cause. The world had grown tired of George W. Bush, and just knowing he would finally be replaced gave some the will to live another day.

Sadly, all hope that Palestinians may have had in U.S. President Barack Obama seems to have evaporated. He began by saying some of the right things, but ultimately failed to get Israel to stop settlement expansion in the West Bank. Most recently, he conceded to Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on a settlement freeze at the United Nations General Assembly.

This retreat was amplified by another fiasco. Seemingly capitulating to American and Israeli pressure, the Palestinian representatives at the United Nations in Geneva tabled the Goldstone Committee Report that alleged Israel had committed war crimes in Gaza.

Any and all recourse Palestinians had for the bloodbath in Gaza disappeared overnight. For Palestinians, the wounds of that horrific war have been reopened, and they cannot even turn to their own leaders for treatment.

The last intifada was sparked when Ariel Sharon and an entourage of countless armed soldiers violated the sanctity of the Noble Sanctuary. Today, tensions in Jerusalem are rising again as demonstrations against home demolitions continue, and Israel continues to prevent the freedom of movement for worshipers into the holy sites.

So now what? That is the question Palestinians are asking. Their leaders have failed them. The United States and Barack Obama, supposedly an honest broker, have failed them. The international community and the system which is supposed to protect the basic human rights of all people have failed them.

To whom shall they turn?

What is certain is that Palestinians will never concede their legitimate rights. But now that every avenue for achieving those goals has been closed off to them, it seems almost inevitable that another uprising is upon us.

We would be naïve, even culpable, if we dared to ask why.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Report: 355 Palestinians held without charge in Israeli prisons

Bethlehem - Ma’an/Agencies - There are currently 355 Palestinians including three women and a child in Israeli custody being held without charge, human rights groups said Wednesday.

The Israeli human rights groups HaMoked and B'Tselem said at least one of the prisoners has been in detention for four and a half years, while 28 others have been detained for between two and four years. All 355 have been held without trial, the report said.

The rights groups told the international press agency that the Israeli administrative detention policy “denies the detainees any possibility to reasonably defend themselves against the allegations made against them."

Administrative detention is intended for use in extreme cases, and generally for short periods of time while law enforcement authorities prepare a case against the detained.

An AFP report on the rights group release noted that in Israel, most cases see judges “declare evidence to be privileged and rely on reports by the Israeli security agencies submitted in the absence of the detainee or his attorney.” The human rights groups said the process made refuting allegations or offering counter evidence all but impossible.

source:
http://maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=232114

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

IDF disguising as medics, press, Bedouins...

12/10/2009 09:09

Jerusalem – Ma’an – A nongovernmental media organization expressed concern on Saturday about reports that undercover Israeli operatives are posing as photojournalists during Palestinian demonstrations against Israeli policies in Jerusalem.

In a statement, Awad Awad, a photojournalist working with the Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA), said that this concern arose from reports they received from residents of the East Jerusalem neighborhood Ras Al-Amoud.

Awad said Ras Al-Amoud residents told MADA that they saw Israeli agents carrying cameras and disguised as press photographers on Thursday and Friday. The same agents, the residents said, arrested young men who participated in the demonstration.

Speaking to Ma’an on Saturday, residents of the area reported identical incidents. Witnesses said they saw Israelis dressed as photographers seize “several” young male protesters.

Ras Al-Amoud saw some of the fiercest clashes between stone-throwing protesters and Israeli riot police. Reported intrusions by Israeli settlers into the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, the third holiest site in Islam, have sparked over a week of demonstrations.

A photo published on the website of the New York Times also showed plainclothes Israeli officers seizing a Palestinian man during a demonstration in East Jerusalem.

In its statement, MADA said that Israeli operatives disguising themselves as photographers could endanger the lives of actual photojournalists.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
12/10/2009 11:14

Bethlehem – Ma'an – While Israel often accuses Palestinians of misusing ambulances as cover for attacks, a report from the country's second-largest newspaper suggests Israel may want to first clean up its own house before accusing others.

In its special magazine supplement, the Hebrew-language daily Ma'ariv exposed an undercover unit created by Israeli police that disguises its operatives as medics, Bedouins, ultra-Orthodox Jews, or even Israeli civilians faking car trouble.

According to the report, the special unit is responsible for targeting Palestinians listed on Israel's long "wanted" list.

Seventeen policemen form the unit, which was created at the end of July, described by Ma'ariv as the first of its kind. The team is reportedly most often deployed in Bedouin residential centers in the Negev, where it boasts 30-40 arrests each month from all over Israel.

The head of the special unit, Yousi Makhluf, proudly explained that its members "are the best men, with more experience, very high investigative intelligence experience, speak Arabic, and have good relations with Bedouins."

"There are no geographical borders that limit the work of the unit, which works in Ramle, Haifa, Ashdod..." he added. "A number of [its members] have served in the army's undercover unit and worked in the West Bank and Gaza, where they were trained in the most advanced methods of disguise and blending in."

Meanwhile, a nongovernmental media organization expressed concern on Saturday about reports that undercover Israeli operatives were posing as photojournalists during Palestinian demonstrations against Israeli policies in Jerusalem.

In a statement, Awad Awad, a photojournalist working with the Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA), said that concerns arose from reports the organization received from residents of the East Jerusalem neighborhood Ras Al-Amoud.

Awad quoted residents saying they saw Israeli agents carrying cameras and disguised as press photographers on Thursday and Friday. The same agents, they, arrested young men who participated in the demonstration.

Speaking to Ma'an on Saturday, residents of the area reported identical incidents. Witnesses said they saw Israelis dressed as photographers seize several young male protesters.

Ras Al-Amoud saw some of the fiercest clashes between stone-throwing protesters and Israeli riot police. Reported intrusions by Israeli settlers into the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, the third holiest site in Islam, have sparked over a week of demonstrations.

The next day, a photo published on the website of The New York Times also showed plainclothes Israeli officers seizing a Palestinian man during a demonstration in East Jerusalem.

In its statement, MADA warned that Israeli operatives disguising themselves as photographers could endanger the lives of actual photojournalists.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Critiquing Nobel Winners & Criticisms from Nobel Winners



Bethlehem - Ma'an - Awarding US President Barack Obama the Nobel Peace Prize is "an absurdity that undermines any meaning or legitimacy of the prize," according to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.

Awarding the prize to Obama, while he "continues to unreservedly support the occupation, subjugation and aggression against the Palestinian people, is a slap in the face to the people of the world struggling to throw off the chains of US imperialism."

In a statement on Friday, the PFLP played down the award, itself, noting that there were numerous notorious recipients of the Nobel, including Henry Kissinger and Shimon Peres, "both proud war criminals."

The PFLP said that not only did Obama not deserve the prize, his nomination discredited peace efforts. "As he threatens an increased and escalated war and occupation against Afghanistan and Pakistan and continues the murderous occupation of Iraq, he has done absolutely nothing to support peace or justice."

On the contrary, the statement added, "all he has done is to foster false illusions through strategic marketing while engaging in the same policies that threaten the people of the world."

While the US president may have a more presentable face to the world than former US President George W Bush, the PFLP added, he represents the same policies and interests. "Obama is not a symbol of peace... he is the symbol of murderous US imperialism."

The group pointed out that in just the past week, Obama used his influence to demand that the Palestinian Authority postpone consideration of the Goldstone report on war crimes in Gaza before the UN Human Rights Council, and has called for escalating the war on Afghanistan.

"He continues to engage in the same US policies of full economic, military, political and diplomatic support for the Zionist regime, while pushing for the liquidation of the Palestinian cause," said the spokesperson. "He has done nothing to remove US nuclear weapons and less than nothing to dislodge the Zionist nuclear threat against the Arab world, while threatening Iran and its people with war."

The statement concluded by saying any prizes for peace should be awarded first to the resistance and people on the front lines in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon and Palestine, confronting "imperialism and its forces."

The PFLP suggested international leaders such as Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez were more deserving, or other "progressive forces around the world who struggle every day for justice and true peace."

--------------------------------
Haaretz: Israeli Nobel Laureate calls for release of all Hamas prisoners
By Haaretz Service and Army Radio

10/10/2009

Israeli Nobel Prize for chemistry laureate Professor Ada Yonath on Saturday said all Hamas prisoners held in Israel should be released in order to bring Gilad Shalit home.

"I don't understand why we incarcerate them in Israel in the first place," the professor told Army Radio Saturday.

She added that "all prisoners should be returned to Palestine regardless of a deal for Gilad Shalit's release."

Yonath was interviewed on the weekly Saturday radio show about her thoughts in general regarding the Middle East conflict and called for a "change in the status quo." She said that holding Palestinians captive encourages and perpetuates their motivation to harm Israel and its citizens.

"If we hold Palestinian prisoners captive for years on end, their familys' resentment for Israel will grow and we are actively creating terrorists," the Nobel Laureate suggested.

She also said that if we cease from incarcerating Palestinians it will end soldier abductions. "Once we don't have any prisoners to release they will have no reason to kidnap soldiers."

Yonath described many Palestinian lives as having "no hope for the future," and said that "in a state of such despair they have every reason to jump at the opportunity to better their prospects for a better afterlife."

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Support Palestine, Boycott Tesco

Tesco: You may be in possession of stolen goods
By: Greg Wilkinson
10/10/2009 18:18

Earlier this week I removed Tesco dates, in packets labeled “Origin: West Bank,” from the shelves of Tesco’s Swansea Marina store. Since last January, I have confiscated a number of similar packets and written to Tesco CEO Terry Leahy explaining why.

I offered to repay the cost of the goods I confiscated if he could show the dates were not the product of illegal Israeli settlements.

In the ensuing correspondence, Tesco neither addressed the settlement issue nor took up my refund offer. I was banned from their stores but not prosecuted.

A more public ‘citizen’s seizure’ was then organized at the same Tesco store. Although a woman accompanying me was charged, for some reason I was not. When the woman’s case came to Swansea Crown Court in June, the judge dismissed it.

Through my MP, Alan Williams, I have written to government ministers urging them to bring UK law into line with the Geneva Conventions and UN Security Council resolutions to which we are signatories.

Bill Rammell (then at the FCO) put the contradiction baldly in his reply: “…the building of Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories is illegal under international law. However the import and sale of products from Israeli settlements…is not prohibited by law in the UK, and we consider this is consistent with the UK’s international law obligations.”

This week, I learned that that the government is citing a Security Council resolution to justify an otherwise illegal freeze on suspects’ assets. This prompts me to adopt a similar line in a further citizen’s seizures.

Where a process is inadmissible, not to mention cruel, so is its product – whether settlement dates, blood diamonds, evidence obtained by torture, or lampshades made of human skin. Where government lawmakers and enforcers fail to uphold our commitments in international law, citizens have a right and duty to step in.

Import and sale of settlement produce amounts to handling stolen goods, it undermines international law and helps prolong a conflict for which Britain bears heavy responsibility.

I have auctioned previous consignments of confiscated West Bank dates in aid of Gaza relief (at £1 per date). Unless you need this sample as evidence, you may care to do the same. Or eat it and serve justice in some other way.

To highlight the inconsistency of the government’s position, and to help change it, I have posted a single date – stolen fruit from stolen land – with a letter of explanation to each of the following: Attorney General Baroness Scotland, Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer QC, Supreme Court Chief Executive Jenny Rose, Justice Secretary Jack Straw, Foreign Secretary David Miliband, and South Wales Chief Constable Barbara Wilding.

Copies of the explanatory letter have been sent to Tesco CEO Terry Leahy, Swansea MP Alan Williams, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign in the UK, the Palestine Monitor group in Ramallah, and the Jewish Anti-war Network in Israel.

I first became aware of events in Palestine when I was working on an earthquake relief team in Lebanon in 1956 and a Palestinian friend gave me a book called Palestine is Our Business.

At Oxford I switched from Politics, Philosophy and Economics to Arabic, with a special study in modern history. During the 1967 war, when Israel took the West Bank, I was Reuters correspondent in Algiers. More recently I have served as an observer/accompanier on the West Bank for British Quakers (although I’m not one).

This brought home the human cost of ever-expanding settlements and the military occupation that sustains them. I also observed that while settlement products moved freely to local and international markets, Palestinian goods were blocked at every turn.

After the invasion of Gaza last winter, it was an Israeli peace group which alerted me to a Palestinian boycott call from Ramallah, and it was this that prompted me to my little local action. I targeted West Bank goods because these can only be the product of the settlements that the British government already recognizes as illegal.

Greg Wilkinson is a teacher who lives in Llanelli, United Kingdom.
-----
for more in formation on the boycott Israeli goods campaign, check out:
http://bigcampaign.org/

Sunday, October 04, 2009

Reacting to Goldstone Report

Justice Delayed is Justice Denied: Decision of Palestinian Leadership and International Pressure an Insult to the Victims

Adalah * Addameer * Aldameer * Al Haq * Al Mezan * Arab Association for Human Rights * Badil * Civic Coalition for Jerusalem * DCI-Palestine * ENSAN Centre * ITTJIAH * Independent Commission for Human Rights * Jerusalem Legal Aid and Human Rights Centre *National Association for Democracy and Law * Palestinian Centre for Human Rights * Ramallah Centre for Human Rights Studies * Women’s Centre for Legal Aid and Counselling *

Yesterday, 2 October 2009, the Palestinian leadership – under heavy international pressure lead by the United States – deferred the draft proposal at the Human Rights Council endorsing all the recommendations of the UN Fact Finding Mission (the Goldstone Report). This deferral denies the Palestinian peoples’ right to an effective judicial remedy and the equal protection of the law. It represents the triumph of politics over human rights. It is an insult to all victims and a rejection of their rights.

The crimes documented in the report of the UN Fact Finding Mission represent the most serious violations of international law; Justice Goldstone concluded that there was evidence to indicate that crimes against humanity may have been committed in the Gaza Strip. Violations of international law continue to this day, inter alia, through the continuing Israeli-imposed illegal blockade of the Gaza Strip. The findings of the Mission confirmed earlier investigations conducted by independent Palestinian, Israeli and international organisations.

The injustice that has now been brought upon Palestinians has been brought upon everyone on this globe. International human rights and humanitarian law are not subject to discrimination, they are not dependent on nationality, religion, or political affiliation. International human rights and humanitarian law apply universally to all human beings.

The rule of law is intended to protect individuals, to guarantee their fundamental rights. Yet, if the rule of law is to be respected it must be enforced. World history, and the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land has shown us that as long as impunity persists, the law will continue to be violated; innocent civilians will continue to suffer the horrific consequences.

Justice delayed is justice denied. All victims have a legitimate right to an effective judicial remedy, and the equal protection of the law. These rights are universal: they are not subject to political considerations. In the nine months since Operation Cast Lead, no effective judicial investigations have been conducted into the conflict. Impunity prevails. In such situations, international law demands recourse to international judicial mechanisms. Victims’ rights must be upheld. Those responsible must be held to account.

The belief that accountability and the rule of law can be brushed aside in the pursuit of peace is misguided. History has taught us time and time again, that sustainable peace can only be built on human rights, on justice, and the rule of law. For many years in Palestine international law, and the rule of law, has been sacrificed in the name of politics, and cast aside in favour of the peace process. This approach has been tried, and it has failed: the occupation has been solidified, illegal settlements have continued to expand, the right to self determination has been denied; innocent civilians suffer the horrific consequences. It is now time to pursue justice, and a peace built on a foundation of human rights, dignity, and the rule of law. In Justice Goldstone’s words, there is no peace without justice.

The justifications given by the Palestinian leadership regarding the decision to defer are inappropriate. Consensus is not required, the United Nations system works on a majority basis. Since the beginning of the UN, and over the course of the Israeli occupation begun in 1967, consensus has rarely been acquired. The UN was established to represent the will of the nations of the world; it is inevitable that there will be dissent and disagreement. Decisions must rest on the will of the majority.

As human rights organisations we strongly condemn the Palestinian leaderships’ decision to defer the proposal endorsing all the recommendations of the Fact Finding Mission, and the pressure exerted by certain members of the international community. Such pressure is in conflict with States international obligations, and is an insult to the Palestinian people.

As human rights and civil society organizations concerned with rights and justice, we declare that we will double our efforts to seek justice for the victims of the violations of human rights and international law in oPt without delay.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Happy 9th Birthday Al-Aqsa Intifada!!!


Maan: Al-Aqsa Intifada turns nine

Gaza - Ma'an - Palestinians quietly commemorated the ninth anniversary of the Second Intifada, as militant brigades vowed revenge for the Sunday attack on Al-Aqsa by Israeli extremists and soldiers.

The Second Intifadah, also known as the Al-Aqsa Intifada, was precipitated by a provocative walk along the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, also the Jewish Western Wall, by then Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. Nine years minus a day later, on 27 September, Israeli extremists illegally entered the Muslim compound for worship, accompanied by Israeli soldiers. Clashes ensued, and were followed by a wave of arrests throughout Palestinian East Jerusalem.

Hamas’ armed wing the Al-Qassam Brigades threatened to respond to the latest attempt to storm Al-Aqsa, saying "the occupation should wait for our response and they must be certain that the Al-Aqsa mosque can outbreak an Intifada.”

Fatah’s armed wing the Al-Aqsa Brigades called for the restoration of the resistance and for officials to declare the state of alert among the resistance factions in order to confront the Israeli aggression.

While many say the Second Intifada petered out after 2003-4, an end to the uprising was never officially declared, as it was for the First Intifada.

Friday, September 25, 2009

Foward: " Palestinian-Led Movement To Boycott Israel Is Gaining Support"

Source: http://www.forward.com/

'Our South Africa Moment Has Finally Arrived,' Says One Leader

By Gal Beckerman
Published September 16, 2009, issue of September 25, 2009.

Uzbekistan-born diamond mogul Lev Leviev announced late in August that his company, Africa-Israel, was drowning in debt of more than $5.5 billion that it could not repay. Over the next two days, shares in the company's stock plummeted by more than one-third. It was relentless bad news for one of the world's richest men. His holding and investment company had lost $1.4 billion since 2008, mostly due to failed real estate investments in the United States. Watching Leviev's precipitous downfall from the sidelines were pro-Palestinian activists. And they were cheering.

Though certainly not the cause of his financial collapse, for the past two years, these activists have singled out Leviev as one of their high-profile villains for his large contributions to West Bank settlements. And they have been effective gadflies. Several of the company's major shareholders have divested their holdings from Africa-Israel after receiving complaints from clients. And at least two charities have declared publicly they will not accept Leviev's contributions.

The pro-Palestinian activists are affiliated with the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, an international coalition with the goal of isolating and discomfiting Israel just as South Africa's apartheid regime was targeted in the 1980s.

Initiated by Palestinian groups in 2005 but strengthened by a network that takes in dozens of leftist organizations in Europe and the United States, the Global BDS Movement claims a number of recent successes. Especially in the wake of the Gaza incursion of last winter, groups associated with the boycott have now felt spurred to expand their efforts into even the sensitive realm of academic and cultural boycotts of Israel.

As Omar Barghouti, one of the Palestinian leaders of the BDS movement, told the Forward, "Our South Africa moment has finally arrived."

Some major Jewish groups acknowledge BDS as a possible threat. "There are clearly a number of episodes building up here that would allow advocates of a boycott to say that slowly, slowly we are achieving what we want, which is the South Africanization of Israel," said American Jewish Committee spokesman Ben Cohen. "I'm not sure that the increase in activity is quite as dramatic as some people would believe, but it's clear to me that this discourse of boycott is being increasingly legitimized, and it would appear that some companies are responsive to it."

The BDS movement is highly decentralized, with each group in the coalition allowed to choose its own targets as it sees fit. It has no articulated political vision. such as a one- or two-state solution to the conflict. The principles that guide the movement - as set out in a call for boycott, divestment and sanctions issued in June 2005 by a wide group of Palestinian civil society organizations - demand instead that Israel adhere to international and human rights law. The amorphous structure and broad goals appear to be responsible for many of the group's appeal. But some who watch this movement closely contend that, in the end, even a "targetted" boycott is ultimately aimed at all of Israel.

The actual monetary impact of the movement is often unclear. But for activists seeking as much to affect Israel's image in the public's mind, money is not always the bottom line.

The campaign against Leviev is a good example. It was initiated by Adalah-NY, one of the handful of American groups in the BDS movement's network. It was Adalah's activists who chose to focus on Leviev's construction projects in the West Bank and on contributions he has made to the Land Redemption Fund, which gives money for settlement development. Adalah-NY protesters first picketed the opening two years ago of Leviev's diamond retail store, yelling at actress Susan Sarandon as she entered the Madison Avenue shop. Since then, the group has taken every opportunity to point out his connections to the West Bank settlements.

Lately, the fruits of this focus on Leviev have been piling up. On Sept. 11 TIAA-CREF, the giant pension fund, announced that it had divested from Africa-Israel last March after 59 of the company's investors accused it of being "a company which violates human rights and international law." UNICEF and OXFAM denied Leviev's public claims to have given them generous contributions and added that they would not accept contributions from him because of his financial support for West Bank settlements. Also, in the past few weeks, a couple of Africa-Israel's largest investors have sold their stock in Leviev's company after receiving pressure from their clients. Most notable was BlackRock, the British subsidiary of the major Wall Street banking firm, which announced that it was divesting following concerns expressed by three client Scandinavian banks.

"Those aren't small things," said Andrew Kadi, a member of Adalah who is involved with the Leviev campaign. "People don't completely grasp how serious it is when two of your top 10 or 12 shareholders divest. We're talking about millions of dollars."

Neither Leviev nor Africa-Israel responded to requests for comment.

Leviev's trouble is just one of many recent signs of the movement's higher profile. There was the protest joined by several celebrities in mid-September at the Toronto International Film Festival of the festival's official cultural partnership with the city of Tel Aviv in celebration of the latter's 100th anniversary. A few days earlier, Neve Gordon, a professor at Ben-Gurion University, wrote a controversial opinion piece in the Los Angeles Times, endorsing the BDS movement as the "only way to counter the apartheid trend in Israel." This past June, the French company Veolia Environnement SA abandoned its multibillion-dollar project to build a light rail train system in Jerusalem after pressure mounted in France from BDS-affiliated groups. The activists counted it as one more victory.

Ironically, Barghouti, who appears to be one of the movement's chief strategists, is currently in a master's degree program in philosophy at Tel Aviv University - even though he is one of the founding members of the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel. He has been one of the activists strongly pushing the greater BDS movement in the direction of opposing any institution associated with Israel.

Asked about his affiliation with an institution he wants boycotted, Barghouti declined to discuss his personal life.

In an e-mail to the Forward, Barghouti emphasized that the BDS movement "does not adopt a particular political solution to the colonial conflict." The main strategy, he wrote, "is based on the principle that human rights and international law must be upheld and respected no matter what the political solution may be. This was key to securing a near consensus in Palestinian civil society and a wide network of support around the world, including the Western mainstream."

The exclusive focus on rights rather than on a political prescription for the conflict brings together both those who want to target Israel's existence as a whole and those-mostly American activists-who stick to the more narrow issue of the occupation and settlement activity.

As far as Barghouti is concerned, BDS is a "comprehensive boycott of Israel, including all its products, academic and cultural institutions, etc." But he understands "the tactical needs of our partners to carry out a selective boycott of settlement products, say, or military suppliers of the Israeli occupation army as the easiest way to rally support around as a black-and-white violation of international law and basic human rights."

Cohen, the AJC spokesman, views this tactic as a transparent deception. "If you probe these groups a little deeper, you'll find that really this is entirely ideologically motivated. They are just a bunch of radical groups that want to see the state of Israel eliminated," he said. "That is the thread that unites all the disparate groups in the BDS movement, they all see BDS as a means to arrive at the goal of a world without Israel. I think that many people who might be troubled by Israel's presence in the West Bank are going to run a mile when they see what the real agenda of these groups are."

The activist group Code Pink: Women for Peace recently turned its attention to this type of targeted boycott, focusing on the cosmetics company Ahava. Based in the kibbutz Mitzpe Shalem, a settlement in the West Bank, Ahava was a convenient target for the group. After picketing stores that sold Ahava products - mostly mud masks and mineral salts from the Dead Sea - the Code Pink activists looked on with satisfaction as the company's spokeswoman, "Sex and the City" star Kristin Davis, was dropped as an ambassador for OXFAM. The group gave its reasons in a statement, saying that it "remains opposed to settlement trade, in which Ahava is engaged."

Nancy Kricorian, Code Pink's New York City coordinator and the organizer of its Ahava campaign, dubbed Stolen Beauty, said that this push against the cosmetics company was effective precisely because it was tightly focused on a settlement operation. And yet, it also fell squarely within the guidelines of the BDS movement's principles and objectives and was even cited by Barghouti as a successful model because it sullied Ahava's name publicly.

Barghouti, Kricorian and other BDS activists attended the national conference of the U.S. Campaign to the End the Israeli Occupation, which took place on September 12 and 13 in Chicago. The organization is itself an amalgamation of dozens of smaller pro-Palestinian groups from across the country. Up until this conference, its BDS activity had also been narrowly focused on American companies involved in the West Bank. Specifically, they have targeted Caterpillar Inc. for manufacturing the bulldozers involved in settlement construction, and Motorola USA for the surveillance and communications equipment used by the Israeli army.

But according to David Hosey, national media coordinator for the campaign, the group resolved at the conference to extend its activities for the first time to the more sensitive cultural and academic boycott. Like many other pro-Palestinian activists, Hosey dated this willingness to increase boycott activity to the Gaza incursion of this past winter.

"It was a big shock to the system, and it caused a big sea change in what people were willing to do," said Rebecca Vilkomerson, the national director of Jewish Voice for Peace, which, though supportive of the BDS movement, has not officially joined it.

Contact Gal Beckerman at beckerman@forward.com

Thursday, September 24, 2009

National Campus Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions Conference

****PLEASE FORWARD WIDELY****

National Campus Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions Conference
endorsed by the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic & Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI).

What & Where: This fall from November 20th through the 22nd, students, faculty, and staff from around the country who are engaged in Palestine solidarity activism will converge for a conference on campus Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS). This conference has three key goals:

1) To co-educate and share resources amongst campus organizers on the process of initiating BDS campaigns on campuses

2) To strategize tactics to address the needs of different campuses in carrying out BDS campaigns

3) To bring together Palestine-solidarity campus groups that have or have not met under a larger network in order to strive towards a coordinated national BDS campaign.

There have been many BDS conferences around the country, but rarely have they focused exclusively on the campus movement. This conference therefore presents an exceptional and important opportunity for this movement.

Why: In July of 2005, “a clear majority of Palestinian civil society called upon international civil society organizations and people of conscience all over the world to impose broad boycotts and implement divestment initiatives against Israel, similar to those applied to South Africa in the apartheid era, until Israel meets its obligation to recognize the Palestinian people's inalienable right to self-determination and fully complies with international law.”* In addition, BDS is a non-violent means of protest and action that campuses in the United States can directly engage in to effectively stand in solidarity with the Palestinian people. A similar strategy was adopted in the struggle to end apartheid in South Africa in the 1970’s and 1980’s, and campus groups played a large role in helping spark and maintain that successful movement.

As campus members in the United States, we are directly complicit in perpetuating the injustices committed against the Palestinian people – our schools’ money is invested in companies that directly profit from Israel’s militarism, annexation of Palestinian land, and apartheid practices. After sixty-years of displacement, over forty-years of occupation, a two-year old siege, and in light of the recent invasion of Gaza and the continuing expansion of settlements in the West Bank, we must act now to cultivate the BDS movement in the United States. As members of academic communities, we can engage BDS as a means of applying economic and public pressure on Israel to abide by international law and we can change the discourse around Palestine/Israel in this country.

How to Participate: Attend the National Campus BDS conference at Hampshire College in Amherst, MA along with other members of your campus group. You will have the opportunity to organize workshops and panels, engage in discussions led by peers, listen to panels and lectures by influential members of the movement, develop skills, share resources, explore strategies, build networks, and more. Workshops at this conference will have a particular focus on: education and campus outreach, movement building strategies, and utilizing publicity and media for BDS. We encourage both Palestine-solidarity and allied groups to attend and contribute to this important conference through general participation, the building of a larger organizing network, and the facilitation of workshops. (In order to facilitate a workshop, please see the “Workshop Proposal Submission Form” attached to this e-mail.)

Prominent public figures and outspoken supporters of the BDS movement will be attending the conference as keynote speakers and panelists, including representatives of the BNC and PACBI.

Dates and Times: Friday, November 20th at 6 PM through Sunday, November 22nd, at 9 PM.

Hosted By: Hampshire College Students for Justice in Palestine and allied groups, and endorsed by various Palestine Solidarity organizations

For more information about the conference, please visit HSJP's website at www.hsjp.org, where we will announce updates, lodging/food information, financial aid, and a place for registration for the conference.

Please forward this to other Palestine solidarity activists and mark the date! See you at Hampshire!

To a free Palestine,
Hampshire College SJP
hampshiresjp@gmail.com

* "What is the Call for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS)? |." Global BDS Movement. 15 June 2009. <http://bdsmovement.net/?q=node/159>.

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Haaretz: "How Israel silenced its Gaza war protesters"

06:18 22/09/2009
By Akiva Eldar

A new report from Adalah shows how the courts and police attempted to stamp out opposition to Operation Cast Lead "This is a time of war, and every incident harms the people's morale."

This was not a sentence in a right-wing journal, but rather a statement by an Israel Police representative during Operation Cast Lead seeking to persuade the Tel Aviv District Court to block anti-war protesters from the city.

Around the same time, in a Haifa Magistrate's Court hearing on extending the remand of minors, Judge Moshe Gilad stated: "Anyone who enables remarks denouncing the state and backing its enemies, even as they rain missiles upon its citizens, must obey its laws, and certainly is prohibited from attacking police who come to impose order. It is similar to a person spitting in the well from which he drinks."

Here are some of the pearls in Adalah's new report: "Prohibited protest - how the law enforcement authorities limit the freedom of expression of opponents of the Gaza military attack." The document, being published for the first time here, was written by attorneys Abeer Baker and Rana Asali. They reviewed and analyzed hundreds of rulings and detention requests, interviewed dozens of human rights activists who were arrested and threatened during the Gaza attack, and documented the behavior of Israeli academia during the moments of truth last winter.

The Adalah report was completed a few days before the Goldstone report was released. It harshly criticizes the damage to freedom of expression and the lack of tolerance for protests, primarily by Arab Israelis, against the attack on Gaza's civilian population. The report shows that enforcements officials did not learn from the October 2000 riots, and did not internalize the Or Commission recommendations.

The authors wrote that while they worked on their report, President Shimon Peres accepted the recommendation by former justice minister Daniel Friedmann to pardon 59 citizens who committed criminal offenses during protests against the disengagement in August 2005. The president stated that the pardons were being granted out of an understanding for the young people's protests, and awareness that this was an unusual, historic event.

The Arabs (and a handful of Jews) protesting against the bloody incidents that took hundreds of lives did not receive a fraction of that understanding.

"In all court decisions we reviewed, the authorities did not mention the reason for the anger of war opponents," they stated. "The hundreds of dead, the injured, the destruction, the tragedy and the damage the Israeli army brought upon Gaza's residents are not mentioned anywhere in any remand decision. The detainees were presented as lawbreakers and criminals who should be treated harshly due to 'the situation,' unconnected from the political climate of their protest."

The war mobilization went up to the Supreme Court. Of seven appeals submitted regarding the detainment of suspects until the completion of proceedings, the court sided with the state in every case. Supreme Court Judge Asher Gronis stated in ruling in favor of the detention of a minor until the end of the proceedings: "Of course, when times change, the matter of detentions will be reconsidered." He added, "When I say 'change in times,' this refers to the end of the military operation in the Gaza Strip and fewer violations in the Northern District."

The researchers note that the "change in times" clause disconnects the detention from the circumstances of the suspect, and makes this a matter of a community's behavior. They note that the detention law was intended to provide uniform tools regarding the revocation of freedom and does not differentiate between war time and peace.

Detentions as a goal

The Adalah researchers found that detentions during fighting became a goal in and of themselves. The police and the State Prosecutor's office vehemently refused to consider releasing even minors from detention or restrictive conditions.

The state's representatives in effect confirmed the detentions were designed "to send a deterrent message to the public as a whole and to the rioters in particular." During another remand extension hearing, they acknowledged this effort was aimed at 'deterring the protesters with force and detaining them until the end of the proceedings in order to convey a message to the public that such behavior is unforgiveable."

These comments were made in a detention motion that the court found was not supported by any factual, evidentiary basis. Somewhat ironically, the police again defined the protests against the war as "a disruption of the peace."

The prevailing trend around the world, including in Israel, is to try minors under proceedings that take into account their needs, welfare and well-being. Despite this, during the operation, hundreds of minors spent weeks behind bars awaiting trial. A review of several decisions regarding "daily detention" indicates how the police inflated the suspicions against the detainees, in order to lengthen their detention.

For example, on December 29, 2008 the Hadera Magistrate's Court received a police motion to hold for another seven days two people suspected of rioting and interfering with a policeman carrying out his duties. The police representative argued that the suspects burned tires, threw stones at policemen and called for Jews to be killed. The court ordered them freed, stating, "The request to extend the detention is baseless and inflated, and it would have been better if some of the remarks in the motion had never been written."

Under its obligation to uphold freedom of speech, specifically in times of conflict, the police used force to try to silence protest. Adalah found numerous testimonies indicating a widespread phenomenon of people being arrested merely because they were present at an incident. Average individuals were accused of serious violations, spent a night in detention and were brought to court handcuffed. At many protest vigils, large numbers of police showed up and dispersed the gathering with force, under the pretense that the gathering was illegal. The testimonies clearly indicate that not all the protests required a police permit.

In some cases, the police conditioned the release of protesters on their not taking part in more protests. Police used harsher threats to disperse legal anti-war protest vigils when there were also right-wing protesters there voicing support for the operation. In these cases, the police officials claimed that as few as three people is enough to justify crowd dispersal, declare the protest illegal and deem all the participants rioters. Protests were dispersed violently, and protesters sometimes suffered serious bruises. Buses en route to protests were commandeered and forced to turn around.

The Shin Bet General Security Service also took part in silencing protest; the police summoned activists, but when they arrived at the police station, they were questioned by Shin Bet investigators. Some activists said their interrogators asked political questions and threatened to persecute them and make them responsible for every violation that occurred during the demonstrations. The attorney general supported the Shin Bet's questioning and threatening methods, saying that it was meant to calm the atmosphere.

The report accuses intellectuals and academics of standing by during the violence in Gaza and overlooking the collective arrests of peace activists. Only a few lecturers mustered the courage to publicly protest the military operation. Academics who protested the collective arrest of settler teens did not speak out against the suspected IDF war crimes and the collective detainment of protesting minors. Academic institutions hung banners and took out newspaper ads voicing support for the war. They stood by while the Shin Bet and the police charged at Jewish and Arab students protesting the operation.

For instance, at the height of the operation, the University of Haifa released the following announcement despite its many Arab students: "As a show of solidarity with IDF soldiers fighting in Gaza and residents of the south, the University of Haifa has made its central tower into a national flag ... the university is not an ivory tower and is inseparably connected to the community. With this symbolic act, it expresses its great appreciation for the residents of the south and its support for the IDF's soldiers."

The ministry responds

The Ministry of Justice spokesman responded: "During Operation Cast Lead there were serious nationalistically motivated gatherings and rioting, occasionally accompanied by real disturbances including stone throwing and road blockades, and in some cases there was risk to human life and public welfare, similar to the events of October 2000 (albeit not on the same scale and not at the same intensity).

"Alongside police efforts to enforce the law and restore order, the prosecution needed to increase steps to enforce the law and prevent the spread of the phenomenon. This was done via increased enforcement, insisting on detention until the conclusion of proceedings, based on the reasons for the detention (primarily endangerment) and carrying out the law to the fullest regarding criminals, subject to the specific circumstances of each case.

"Court rulings, through the October 2000 events, called for detaining rioters - including minors - who were involved in nationalistically motivated disturbances that posed a threat to passersby and security forces, based on the specific danger posed by each detainee. The Supreme Court on more than one occasion determined that a person who throws stones at government agents seeking to restore order or at innocent bystanders may continue to endanger public safety and even human life.

"That the actions stem from ideological fervor, and take place in large and heated gatherings, make them more dangerous. This is a phenomenon that builds on itself. Once it became part of the agenda of those rioters, the court ruled that the threat to human life cannot be ignored.

"In cases involving the detention of minors, the prosecutors were instructed to ask courts to begin proceedings as soon as possible and to handle the cases quickly."

Friday, September 18, 2009

Maan: "The Israeli’s of Bil’in: joining Palestinians against the wall"


Bil'in - Ma'an - For over four years the international media has reported on the weekly protests in the small West Bank village of Bil’in. They report that Israel has moved the separation wall so it annexes over 60% of the village, that the residents of Bil’in once worked the confiscated land as a source of livelihood and that after every Friday prayer there is a non-violent protest that gets dispersed by tear gas. What is left out from such accounts is that many who attend these West Bank protests are Israelis Jews.

So what are these Israelis doing? They are breaking Israeli law by entering the West Bank, not to mention the newly relabeled “closed military zone” of Bil’in.” And perhaps even more daring, these Jewish protesters are breaking from the Zionist glue that professes that Israel can do-no-wrong—especially when it comes to the treatment of Palestinians.

A wall within

“You first have to cross a wall within yourself,” says Inbar, a 22 year-old student at Tel Aviv University referring metaphorically to the separation wall Israel has constructed around half of the West Bank.

“I lost friends the first time I came... I was an outcast. And when the solders saw me they pushed me and called me a whore. I only tell a few people [Israelis] what I do on my Fridays now. Not everyone is, how shall we say, open?”

Many Israelis who to attend the anti-wall protests in Bil’in, or those in the villages of Ni’lin or Al-Ma’asara, say they come on a regular basis. Some say they have been attending these rallies for over four years.

Inbar continues, “Just because I was born Jewish does not make me different. I consider us all people who work this land… as our ancestors did together for so many years before. You cannot change history.”

“But you also can’t push facts on people if they don’t want to hear it. They will reject it outright. Still, I am willing to have that argument.”
Inbar studies agriculture and says that despite her unpopular views, she still has an active social life in Israel.

“The Israeli government has a lot invested in this wall. I think eventually it will move. Not come down, but move… which is a still bad because nothing has done more to separate Israelis from Palestinians… than this,” she said pointing at the wall.

“I come to show my solidarity. If protesting this wall is something we can do together, then so be it.”

Some in regular attendance of these West Bank protests estimate that up to half of the international participates are Israelis Jews. Many come with an organization, or car-pool from hubs like Tel Aviv or Jerusalem.

The refuseniks

“We are not the left-wing,” says Dany, a 29-year-old artist and activist from Netanya. “They hate us because people confuse us with them. I refused to serve in the army.

“I come out [to Bil’in] for many reasons—land-theft, basic human rights and injustice in my own name. For 18-months I have been getting tear gassed by my own people.”

“That speaks loudly to Palestinians. They know our history. And I will be back next Friday.”

All Israelis must serve in the Israeli army; postings include everything from checkpoint duty to organizing social events for troops on their off days. While most assignments do not require combat, they do require being part of an occupational force. That is unacceptable for some Israelis. Such are called refuseniks.

Commonly, there are two categories of Israeli who refuse army service. The first kind is an already enlisted reserve solder that signs a letter refusing to serve in the occupied territories. The second is an Israeli that simply does not want to be part of the occupation force and refuses to serve in any post mandated by the army.

Refusing the Israeli army is punishable by imprisonment.

Two sides to every wall

Meet Assaf. He is a 24-year-old Israeli, a self-proclaimed “lover of peace” and a former medic for the Israeli army who served in the West Bank. “I have seen violence and I hate it,” he says. “I hate it more than anything. It is a disease of humanity.

“When I was a medic in the IDF [Israeli army forces] I was on the other side of these protests. The other side of this wall.”

Assaf went on to suggest that the Palestinians should get giant posters of Gandhi and read Marin Luther King speeches over a loud speaker at the next Friday protest. “They [the protests] are in the right direction, but they need more organization. More structure.

“I didn’t like it [throwing rocks at the solders] when I was in the IDF and I don’t like it now. It encourages the solders to react.” Violence breeds more violence, he said.

“As [Israeli] solders we are told by our commanders that ‘the world hates us’ and that ‘if it was up to these people the holocaust would be nothing.’ Our IDF commanders used the Jewish narrative to put fear in us.

“It is just crazy to think that beyond the gas, beyond the wall and beyond the armor, they [the Israeli soldiers] are actually terrified of the 50 unarmed people here. Simply crazy.”

The gassing at Bil’in

When Bil’in’s Imam concludes the weekly Friday prayer, a group forms outside the main mosque. They begin to beat their chests and chant anti-occupation slogans. “One, two, three, four, occupation no more,” is a normal cry. And the protest comes to life.

Palestinians, internationals (Israelis included) and a small army of press cross the sunken wadi, or valley in Arabic, and approach the wall that has annexed over half of the land of the village. Israeli soldiers pour out of their armored barracks in anticipation. The protesters continue to shout and take pictures; a daring few opt to abuse the barbwire fence. Many of the Israeli civilians look through the crowd to their nation’s solders, with Bil’in’s occupied land as a painful background.

Out of nowhere, rocks start to fly from the hands of teenage Palestinians who crouch behind ancient boulders and olive trees. The Israeli soldiers on the other side of the fence watch, occasionally flinching in their expensive armor.

And then, like a monsoon, tear gas comes raining from the sky. The crowd falls back through the wadi and back into the village of Bil’in.
On the pavement is a young Israeli protester. He is faint from the gas and red in the face. His tear ducts are in overdrive, tying to rid his eyes from his own country’s gas. The Israeli is alone.

An elder from the village calmly approaches him. Recognizing the situation, the elder says in an Arabic-accented Hebrew, “shalom aleichem,” or peace be upon you, and he extends his hand.

The young Israeli is slow, but he gets up. The Palestinian elder waits. And the Jew and the Arab walk back to the village. Together.

And so is the Friday drama in the West Bank village of Bil’in.

Sunday, September 13, 2009

Come to Palestine: ISM's Olive Harvest 2009

Join the 2009 Olive Harvest Campaign

With rapidly escalating levels of settler violence in the West Bank, the International Solidarity Movement is issuing an urgent call for volunteers to participate in the 2009 Olive Harvest Campaign.

The olive tree is a national symbol for Palestinians. As thousands of olive trees have been bulldozed, uprooted and burned by the Israeli military and settlers, harvesting has become more than a source of livelihood; it has become a form of resistance. The olive harvest is an annual affirmation of Palestinians' historical, spiritual and economic connection to their land, and a rejection of Israeli efforts to seize it.

Palestinian communities are inviting internationals to support and show solidarity with this resistance by working in the olive groves with them. By doing so, activists can reduce the risk of extreme violence from Israeli settlers or army through non-violent intervention and documentation.

The campaign will begin on the 3rd of October and run for approximately 6-8 weeks, depending on the size of the harvest. We ask that volunteers commit at least 2 weeks of their time.

Training:

The ISM will be holding mandatory two day training sessions held every Saturday and Sunday.
(see: http://palsolidarity.org/join). Please contact palreports@gmail.com for further information.)

Ongoing campaigns:

In addition to the olive harvest, there will also be other opportunities to participate in grass-roots, non-violent resistance in Palestine.

In occupied East Jerusalem, ISM activists have been staying with the Hanoun and Ghawe families, prior and post their evictions. We will continue to support the initiatives of the families who face evictions or demolitions in Sheikh Jarrah, Silwan and other Palestinian neighborhoods in resisting the ethnic cleansing of occupied East Jerusalem
(see: http://palsolidarity.org/tag/east-jerusalem).

ISM has been active in the village of Ni'lin, supporting its non-violent resistance to construction of the Apartheid Wall that annexes much of its land. Since May 2008, Ni’lin has been demonstrating and the Israeli military suppression of their unarmed protests has led to the death of 5 Palestinians and critical injury of an ISM activist
(see: http://palsolidarity.org/tag/nilin).

In Bil’in, ISM has once again taken an apartment to participate in prevention of arrests and the ongoing night raids. Since the beginning of the summer, Israeli forces have been invading and arresting in the village of Bil’in, known for its creative resistance to the Apartheid Wall and construction of settlements on village lands
(see: http://palsolidarity.org/tag/bilin).

Additionally, ISM maintains a presence in Hebron and Susiya. Work in these areas includes solidarity visits, farmer accompaniment and response to settler violence
(see: http://palsolidarity.org/tag/hebron and http://palsolidarity.org/tag/susiya).

Come! Bear witness to the suffering, courage and generosity of the Palestinian people under Israeli occupation. Experiencing the situation for yourself is vital to adequately convey the reality of life in Palestine to your home communities and to re-frame the debate in a way that will expose Israel's apartheid policies; creeping ethnic cleansing in the West Bank and occupied East Jerusalem as well as collective punishment and genocidal practices in Gaza.

Wednesday, September 09, 2009

BBC: " Israel 'understated' Gaza deaths"

An Israeli human rights group says many more Palestinian civilians were killed in the Israeli military's campaign in Gaza than the army admits.

B'Tselem said detailed research with careful cross-checking showed 1,387 Palestinians died, over half of them civilians and 252 of them children.

This contradicts an Israeli army report stating fewer than 300 civilians died in fighting in December and January.

Israel launched the assault to halt rocket attacks from Hamas-run Gaza.

The overall B'Tselem total broadly tallies with the official Palestinian death toll and the findings of other non-governmental organisations, although the proportion of civilians it identifies is lower.


The group says the extent of civilian deaths does not prove, in itself, that Israel violated the laws of war.

However, it says it raises grave concerns about the military's behaviour when taken in the context of "numerous testimonies" from troops and Palestinians.

Amnesty International has already accused Israel of committing war crimes during its offensive.

The Israeli army has admitted "rare mishaps" during the campaign but denies troops violated international humanitarian law.

'Serious introspection'

B'Tselem said the findings had been compiled during months of research, including visits to the families of those killed.

It said it was unable to compare its figures with the official Israeli ones because the military refused to provide its list of fatalities.

The group said the results should compel the Israeli government to launch an independent investigation into its three-week offensive.

Earlier this year the Israeli army said that 1,166 Gazans were killed in the conflict, a quarter of whom were civilians.

Its figures indicated that the toll included 709 militants from Hamas and other groups, and 295 non-combatants.

According to B'Tselem, 1,387 Palestinians were killed by the Israeli military, including 773 civilians, 330 combatants and 248 civilian police - whom Israeli officials classify as militants.

B'Tselem has counted 252 children under the age of 16 who were killed - the military puts that figure at 89 - and 109 women over 18.

"The extremely heavy civilian casualties and the massive damage to civilian property require serious introspection on the part of Israeli society," B'Tselem said, adding that it considered the army's internal probe insufficient.

The group acknowledged the challenges of combat in the densely crowded Gaza Strip, and criticised the "illegal and immoral actions" by Palestinian militants accused of hiding among the civilian population.

But this "cannot legitimise such extensive harm to civilians by a state committed to the rule of law", B'Tselem added.

The Israeli military had no immediate comment on the report, but has previously rejected such criticism.

It has said the aim of the campaign "was target the Hamas terror organisation and not citizens of the Gaza Strip".

More Information:
B'tselem Report: http://www.btselem.org/English/Press_Releases/20090909.asp

Sunday, September 06, 2009

IDF filmed aiming tear gas at Al-Jazeera reporter in West Bank

Video footage that aired Friday shows an Al-Jazeera reporter covering an anti-separation fence rally in the West Bank dodging a tear gas grenade fired by Israel Defense Forces troops.



Jacky Rowland was reporting Friday from the West Bank village of Bil'in, explaining to viewers about the separation fence and the weekly protests that take place there, when Israeli troops began firing tear gas at the protesters and then directly at her.

The footage shows Rowland, wearing a helmet, exclaiming "We're under attack!" as a tear gas grenade flies past her.

She continues reporting, telling viewers that the Israeli soldiers are "obviously trying to take us off the air."